学习市场语言:英国地区卫生当局的信息系统战略形成

Matthew R. Jones
{"title":"学习市场语言:英国地区卫生当局的信息系统战略形成","authors":"Matthew R. Jones","doi":"10.1016/0959-8022(94)90001-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we seek to show that the process of strategy formation may be viewed at four different “levels,” that of strategic resources, of the strategy process, of the discourse of strategy and of broader social discourses. The mainstream strategy literature addressed only the first of these. Processual approaches to strategy research extend the analysis to consider the second level, but have recently been criticized as neglecting the role of strategy as a form of social discourse. Explanations at the third level address the specific power effects of this discourse and its role in constituting the subjectivity of strategic actors and the problems to which it is applied. We also suggest, however, that strategic discourse may itself be considered a part of the broader social discourses of entrepreneurialism and managerialism. A case study of information systems strategy formation in the UK National Health Service is used to illustrate this argument and to show that the strategy process may be seen as involving learning in terms of each of the perspectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100011,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 119-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0959-8022(94)90001-9","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning the language of the market: Information systems strategy formation in a UK district health authority\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0959-8022(94)90001-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we seek to show that the process of strategy formation may be viewed at four different “levels,” that of strategic resources, of the strategy process, of the discourse of strategy and of broader social discourses. The mainstream strategy literature addressed only the first of these. Processual approaches to strategy research extend the analysis to consider the second level, but have recently been criticized as neglecting the role of strategy as a form of social discourse. Explanations at the third level address the specific power effects of this discourse and its role in constituting the subjectivity of strategic actors and the problems to which it is applied. We also suggest, however, that strategic discourse may itself be considered a part of the broader social discourses of entrepreneurialism and managerialism. A case study of information systems strategy formation in the UK National Health Service is used to illustrate this argument and to show that the strategy process may be seen as involving learning in terms of each of the perspectives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 119-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0959-8022(94)90001-9\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959802294900019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Management and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0959802294900019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在本文中,我们试图表明战略形成的过程可以从四个不同的“层面”来看待,即战略资源、战略过程、战略话语和更广泛的社会话语。主流战略文献只讨论了其中的第一个问题。策略研究的过程方法将分析扩展到考虑第二个层面,但最近被批评为忽视了策略作为一种社会话语形式的作用。第三层次的解释涉及这一话语的具体权力效应及其在构成战略行动者主体性方面的作用,以及它所适用的问题。然而,我们也建议,战略话语本身可以被视为创业主义和管理主义的更广泛的社会话语的一部分。本文以英国国家卫生服务信息系统战略形成的案例研究为例,说明了这一论点,并表明战略过程可以被视为涉及到每个视角的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning the language of the market: Information systems strategy formation in a UK district health authority

In this paper we seek to show that the process of strategy formation may be viewed at four different “levels,” that of strategic resources, of the strategy process, of the discourse of strategy and of broader social discourses. The mainstream strategy literature addressed only the first of these. Processual approaches to strategy research extend the analysis to consider the second level, but have recently been criticized as neglecting the role of strategy as a form of social discourse. Explanations at the third level address the specific power effects of this discourse and its role in constituting the subjectivity of strategic actors and the problems to which it is applied. We also suggest, however, that strategic discourse may itself be considered a part of the broader social discourses of entrepreneurialism and managerialism. A case study of information systems strategy formation in the UK National Health Service is used to illustrate this argument and to show that the strategy process may be seen as involving learning in terms of each of the perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信