{"title":"前南斯拉夫的社会运动和批评话语:结构方法","authors":"Filip Balunović","doi":"10.2298/fid2102296b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until a decade ago, a comprehensive contestation of the so-called\n ?transitional? paradigm was largely missing in the post-socialist era. This\n reality changed in the last ten years, especially in the region of former\n Yugoslavia. Some social movements in this region have started questioning\n the very essence of the economic and social misconceptions of the\n post-socialist condition. This paper first provides an elaboration of the\n very conceptual edifice of the ruling paradigm (hence the object of the\n critique of the three social movements in question), as well as a\n theoretical and methodological framework. It goes on to map out the\n epistemic discursive content of the respective social movements in Belgrade,\n Zagreb and Sarajevo, thereby assessing the conceptual content of their\n critique of the post-socialist transitional paradigm. Finally, given the\n similarities between Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the paper\n seeks to explain variations in the critique by how the structural and\n contextual features impact the perspective from which it is constructed.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social movements and critical discourses in former Yugoslavia: Structural approach\",\"authors\":\"Filip Balunović\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/fid2102296b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Until a decade ago, a comprehensive contestation of the so-called\\n ?transitional? paradigm was largely missing in the post-socialist era. This\\n reality changed in the last ten years, especially in the region of former\\n Yugoslavia. Some social movements in this region have started questioning\\n the very essence of the economic and social misconceptions of the\\n post-socialist condition. This paper first provides an elaboration of the\\n very conceptual edifice of the ruling paradigm (hence the object of the\\n critique of the three social movements in question), as well as a\\n theoretical and methodological framework. It goes on to map out the\\n epistemic discursive content of the respective social movements in Belgrade,\\n Zagreb and Sarajevo, thereby assessing the conceptual content of their\\n critique of the post-socialist transitional paradigm. Finally, given the\\n similarities between Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the paper\\n seeks to explain variations in the critique by how the structural and\\n contextual features impact the perspective from which it is constructed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo\",\"volume\":\"2022 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2102296b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2102296b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social movements and critical discourses in former Yugoslavia: Structural approach
Until a decade ago, a comprehensive contestation of the so-called
?transitional? paradigm was largely missing in the post-socialist era. This
reality changed in the last ten years, especially in the region of former
Yugoslavia. Some social movements in this region have started questioning
the very essence of the economic and social misconceptions of the
post-socialist condition. This paper first provides an elaboration of the
very conceptual edifice of the ruling paradigm (hence the object of the
critique of the three social movements in question), as well as a
theoretical and methodological framework. It goes on to map out the
epistemic discursive content of the respective social movements in Belgrade,
Zagreb and Sarajevo, thereby assessing the conceptual content of their
critique of the post-socialist transitional paradigm. Finally, given the
similarities between Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the paper
seeks to explain variations in the critique by how the structural and
contextual features impact the perspective from which it is constructed.