墨西哥国会评估证据的使用

Blanca Victoria López Rodríguez
{"title":"墨西哥国会评估证据的使用","authors":"Blanca Victoria López Rodríguez","doi":"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/lopez","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of evaluation is on the extent is used to guide public decisions for improving public programs and for legislative actions at Congress. Therefore, this study aims to find out the use of evaluative evidence at the mexican Congress, through a qualitative analysis of health sector programs’ evaluations, a review of the legislative work and interviews of Congress people and staff at the legislative branch during 2007–2018. The main findings point to the limited use of evaluation due to its political role and other institutional factors. Finally, some proposals to enable the use of evaluative evidence in legislative agenda are offered.","PeriodicalId":85291,"journal":{"name":"Polis (Bologna, Italy)","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EL USO DE LA EVIDENCIA EVALUATIVA EN EL CONGRESO MEXICANO\",\"authors\":\"Blanca Victoria López Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/lopez\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effectiveness of evaluation is on the extent is used to guide public decisions for improving public programs and for legislative actions at Congress. Therefore, this study aims to find out the use of evaluative evidence at the mexican Congress, through a qualitative analysis of health sector programs’ evaluations, a review of the legislative work and interviews of Congress people and staff at the legislative branch during 2007–2018. The main findings point to the limited use of evaluation due to its political role and other institutional factors. Finally, some proposals to enable the use of evaluative evidence in legislative agenda are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polis (Bologna, Italy)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polis (Bologna, Italy)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/lopez\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polis (Bologna, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2022v18n1/lopez","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估的有效性取决于它在多大程度上被用来指导公共决策,以改进公共项目和国会的立法行动。因此,本研究旨在通过对卫生部门方案评估的定性分析、对立法工作的回顾以及对2007-2018年国会议员和立法部门工作人员的访谈,找出墨西哥国会使用评估性证据的情况。主要调查结果指出,由于其政治作用和其他体制因素,评价的使用有限。最后,对如何在立法议程中运用评价性证据提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EL USO DE LA EVIDENCIA EVALUATIVA EN EL CONGRESO MEXICANO
The effectiveness of evaluation is on the extent is used to guide public decisions for improving public programs and for legislative actions at Congress. Therefore, this study aims to find out the use of evaluative evidence at the mexican Congress, through a qualitative analysis of health sector programs’ evaluations, a review of the legislative work and interviews of Congress people and staff at the legislative branch during 2007–2018. The main findings point to the limited use of evaluation due to its political role and other institutional factors. Finally, some proposals to enable the use of evaluative evidence in legislative agenda are offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信