Christian VandeLune, T. Tazegul, Samuel J Ahrenholz, C. Iehl, Victoria Y. Vivtcharenko, Eli L Schmidt, Kevin N Dibbern, H. Lee, M. Lalevée, N. S. Barbachan Mansur, C. de César Netto
{"title":"金属和生物一体化螺钉周围植入物相关伪影:CT扫描3D Hounsfield单元评估","authors":"Christian VandeLune, T. Tazegul, Samuel J Ahrenholz, C. Iehl, Victoria Y. Vivtcharenko, Eli L Schmidt, Kevin N Dibbern, H. Lee, M. Lalevée, N. S. Barbachan Mansur, C. de César Netto","doi":"10.30795/jfootankle.2021.v15.1562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the degree of implant-related artifacts (IRA) around metallic and bio-integrative (BI) cannulated screws using Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT). Our hypothesis was that BI implants would demonstrate significantly decreased IRA around the inserted screws. Methods: In this cadaveric CT imaging study, we used 2 below-knee specimens. Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy was performed, and the specimens were fixed with either metallic or BI screws. HU values were measured over 4 different lines that crossed the osteotomy position. Results: The mean HU value was decreased in the BI implants compared to the metallic ones in 3 different positions: near the screw, directly over the screw, and inside the screw cannula. At the line placed 1 cm dorsal to the screw, the HU value for the metallic screw was lower than that for the BI screw. Conclusions: We found metallic implants to demonstrate significantly increased HU values in regions close to the implant and significantly decreased values 1 cm away from the implant, when compared to the BI screw. The decreased HU values 1 cm away from the implant could be due to a shielding effect of the surrounding bone, hindering the assessment of union and healing. BI implants represent an alternative to decrease these IRA effects. Level of Evidence III; Case-Control Study.","PeriodicalId":21602,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant-related artifacts around metallic and bio-integrative screws: a CT scan 3D Hounsfield unit assessment\",\"authors\":\"Christian VandeLune, T. Tazegul, Samuel J Ahrenholz, C. Iehl, Victoria Y. Vivtcharenko, Eli L Schmidt, Kevin N Dibbern, H. Lee, M. Lalevée, N. S. Barbachan Mansur, C. de César Netto\",\"doi\":\"10.30795/jfootankle.2021.v15.1562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the degree of implant-related artifacts (IRA) around metallic and bio-integrative (BI) cannulated screws using Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT). Our hypothesis was that BI implants would demonstrate significantly decreased IRA around the inserted screws. Methods: In this cadaveric CT imaging study, we used 2 below-knee specimens. Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy was performed, and the specimens were fixed with either metallic or BI screws. HU values were measured over 4 different lines that crossed the osteotomy position. Results: The mean HU value was decreased in the BI implants compared to the metallic ones in 3 different positions: near the screw, directly over the screw, and inside the screw cannula. At the line placed 1 cm dorsal to the screw, the HU value for the metallic screw was lower than that for the BI screw. Conclusions: We found metallic implants to demonstrate significantly increased HU values in regions close to the implant and significantly decreased values 1 cm away from the implant, when compared to the BI screw. The decreased HU values 1 cm away from the implant could be due to a shielding effect of the surrounding bone, hindering the assessment of union and healing. BI implants represent an alternative to decrease these IRA effects. Level of Evidence III; Case-Control Study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2021.v15.1562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2021.v15.1562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:应用霍斯菲尔德单元(Hounsfield unit, HU)对金属和生物一体化空心螺钉(BI)周围植入物相关伪影(IRA)的程度进行评估。我们的假设是,BI植入物会显著降低置入螺钉周围的IRA。方法:在本研究中,我们使用了2例膝关节以下的尸体CT图像。行内侧移位跟骨截骨术,标本用金属或BI螺钉固定。在穿过截骨位置的4条不同线上测量HU值。结果:与金属种植体相比,BI种植体在螺钉附近、螺钉正上方和螺钉套管内3个不同位置的平均HU值均有所降低。在距螺钉背侧1cm处,金属螺钉的HU值低于BI螺钉。结论:与BI螺钉相比,我们发现金属种植体在靠近种植体的区域显着增加HU值,而在距离种植体1cm处显着降低HU值。距离种植体1cm处的HU值降低可能是由于周围骨的屏蔽作用,阻碍了对愈合和愈合的评估。BI植入物是减少这些IRA影响的另一种选择。证据等级III;病例对照研究。
Implant-related artifacts around metallic and bio-integrative screws: a CT scan 3D Hounsfield unit assessment
Objective: To assess the degree of implant-related artifacts (IRA) around metallic and bio-integrative (BI) cannulated screws using Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT). Our hypothesis was that BI implants would demonstrate significantly decreased IRA around the inserted screws. Methods: In this cadaveric CT imaging study, we used 2 below-knee specimens. Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy was performed, and the specimens were fixed with either metallic or BI screws. HU values were measured over 4 different lines that crossed the osteotomy position. Results: The mean HU value was decreased in the BI implants compared to the metallic ones in 3 different positions: near the screw, directly over the screw, and inside the screw cannula. At the line placed 1 cm dorsal to the screw, the HU value for the metallic screw was lower than that for the BI screw. Conclusions: We found metallic implants to demonstrate significantly increased HU values in regions close to the implant and significantly decreased values 1 cm away from the implant, when compared to the BI screw. The decreased HU values 1 cm away from the implant could be due to a shielding effect of the surrounding bone, hindering the assessment of union and healing. BI implants represent an alternative to decrease these IRA effects. Level of Evidence III; Case-Control Study.