亚太心脏期刊读者偏好调查,1999

Meryl J. Fullerton, Franklin Rosenfeldt
{"title":"亚太心脏期刊读者偏好调查,1999","authors":"Meryl J. Fullerton,&nbsp;Franklin Rosenfeldt","doi":"10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90077-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background:</em> With a shift in geographical focus to include the Pacific rim, and with the Journal's scope now broadened to embrace cardiology, the Editorial Board of the APHJ wished to obtain the views of the wider readership on the Journal format and style. <em>Aim:</em> To determine the views of readers in the evolving process of structuring the Journal and to stimulate discussion about the future role of the APHJ. <em>Method.</em> Subscribers were asked anonymously by questionnaire for their views on the subjects and styles of articles currently published by the Journal. <em>Results:</em> One-hundred and two replies were received (a response rate of 15%). The main subjects of interest were, in order of importance: cardiology, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and basic research, these being a reflection of the professional interests of the responders. Cardiologists were interested primarily in articles on general clinical cardiology, followed by interventional cardiology and clinical research. Cardiothoracic surgeons showed an overwhelming primary interest in cardiac surgery, followed by thoracic surgery and clinical research, a reflection of the higher response rate from cardiac compared with thoracic surgeons. Interests in basic research were in physiology, followed by atherosclerosis, pharmacology and molecular biology. <em>Conclusion:</em> The most popular styles of articles for all disciplines were reviews by experts, followed by original research papers and scientific editorials. These, in turn, were more highly favoured than professional editorials, how-to-do-it articles and case reports. The Editorial Board has taken heed of these views and is now using this information in setting the Journal style for the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101218,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 115-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90077-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Asia pacific heart journal readers' preferences survey, 1999\",\"authors\":\"Meryl J. Fullerton,&nbsp;Franklin Rosenfeldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90077-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Background:</em> With a shift in geographical focus to include the Pacific rim, and with the Journal's scope now broadened to embrace cardiology, the Editorial Board of the APHJ wished to obtain the views of the wider readership on the Journal format and style. <em>Aim:</em> To determine the views of readers in the evolving process of structuring the Journal and to stimulate discussion about the future role of the APHJ. <em>Method.</em> Subscribers were asked anonymously by questionnaire for their views on the subjects and styles of articles currently published by the Journal. <em>Results:</em> One-hundred and two replies were received (a response rate of 15%). The main subjects of interest were, in order of importance: cardiology, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and basic research, these being a reflection of the professional interests of the responders. Cardiologists were interested primarily in articles on general clinical cardiology, followed by interventional cardiology and clinical research. Cardiothoracic surgeons showed an overwhelming primary interest in cardiac surgery, followed by thoracic surgery and clinical research, a reflection of the higher response rate from cardiac compared with thoracic surgeons. Interests in basic research were in physiology, followed by atherosclerosis, pharmacology and molecular biology. <em>Conclusion:</em> The most popular styles of articles for all disciplines were reviews by experts, followed by original research papers and scientific editorials. These, in turn, were more highly favoured than professional editorials, how-to-do-it articles and case reports. The Editorial Board has taken heed of these views and is now using this information in setting the Journal style for the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1328-0163(99)90077-5\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1328016399900775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1328016399900775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着地理重点的转变,包括环太平洋地区,随着期刊的范围现在扩大到包括心脏病学,APHJ的编辑委员会希望获得更广泛的读者对期刊格式和风格的看法。目的:确定读者在期刊结构演变过程中的观点,并激发对APHJ未来角色的讨论。方法。订阅者通过匿名问卷询问他们对《华尔街日报》目前发表的文章的主题和风格的看法。结果:共收到回复102份(回复率15%)。主要感兴趣的科目,按重要性排序为:心脏病学,心脏外科,胸外科和基础研究,这些反映了响应者的专业兴趣。心脏病专家主要对一般临床心脏病学的文章感兴趣,其次是介入性心脏病学和临床研究。心胸外科医生对心脏手术表现出压倒性的主要兴趣,其次是胸外科和临床研究,这反映了与胸外科医生相比,心胸外科医生的反应率更高。对基础研究感兴趣的是生理学,其次是动脉粥样硬化、药理学和分子生物学。结论:各学科最流行的文章体裁是专家评议,其次是原创研究论文和科学社论。反过来,这些文章比专业社论、如何做的文章和案例报告更受欢迎。编辑委员会已经注意到这些观点,现在正在利用这些信息来制定《华尔街日报》未来的风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Asia pacific heart journal readers' preferences survey, 1999

Background: With a shift in geographical focus to include the Pacific rim, and with the Journal's scope now broadened to embrace cardiology, the Editorial Board of the APHJ wished to obtain the views of the wider readership on the Journal format and style. Aim: To determine the views of readers in the evolving process of structuring the Journal and to stimulate discussion about the future role of the APHJ. Method. Subscribers were asked anonymously by questionnaire for their views on the subjects and styles of articles currently published by the Journal. Results: One-hundred and two replies were received (a response rate of 15%). The main subjects of interest were, in order of importance: cardiology, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and basic research, these being a reflection of the professional interests of the responders. Cardiologists were interested primarily in articles on general clinical cardiology, followed by interventional cardiology and clinical research. Cardiothoracic surgeons showed an overwhelming primary interest in cardiac surgery, followed by thoracic surgery and clinical research, a reflection of the higher response rate from cardiac compared with thoracic surgeons. Interests in basic research were in physiology, followed by atherosclerosis, pharmacology and molecular biology. Conclusion: The most popular styles of articles for all disciplines were reviews by experts, followed by original research papers and scientific editorials. These, in turn, were more highly favoured than professional editorials, how-to-do-it articles and case reports. The Editorial Board has taken heed of these views and is now using this information in setting the Journal style for the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信