{"title":"为什么粗神经孢子虫纯合子的大重复杂交不育","authors":"A. Bhat, D. P. Kasbekar","doi":"10.4148/1941-4765.1136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crosses homozygous for the duplication Dp(AR17) are barren regardless of RIP. Sad-1, a semi-dominant suppressor of meiotic silencing, suppresses the barrenness of duplication-heterozygous but not of duplicationhomozygous crosses. Could it be that in the context of the homozygous cross the sad-1+ allele is not detected as being unpaired, and consequently, Sad-1 fails to suppress meiotic silencing? Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License. This regular paper is available in Fungal Genetics Reports: http://newprairiepress.org/fgr/vol51/iss1/6","PeriodicalId":12490,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Genetics Reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"15-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why are Neurospora crassa crosses that are homozygous for a large duplication barren\",\"authors\":\"A. Bhat, D. P. Kasbekar\",\"doi\":\"10.4148/1941-4765.1136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crosses homozygous for the duplication Dp(AR17) are barren regardless of RIP. Sad-1, a semi-dominant suppressor of meiotic silencing, suppresses the barrenness of duplication-heterozygous but not of duplicationhomozygous crosses. Could it be that in the context of the homozygous cross the sad-1+ allele is not detected as being unpaired, and consequently, Sad-1 fails to suppress meiotic silencing? Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License. This regular paper is available in Fungal Genetics Reports: http://newprairiepress.org/fgr/vol51/iss1/6\",\"PeriodicalId\":12490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Genetics Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"15-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Genetics Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.1136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Genetics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.1136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why are Neurospora crassa crosses that are homozygous for a large duplication barren
Crosses homozygous for the duplication Dp(AR17) are barren regardless of RIP. Sad-1, a semi-dominant suppressor of meiotic silencing, suppresses the barrenness of duplication-heterozygous but not of duplicationhomozygous crosses. Could it be that in the context of the homozygous cross the sad-1+ allele is not detected as being unpaired, and consequently, Sad-1 fails to suppress meiotic silencing? Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License. This regular paper is available in Fungal Genetics Reports: http://newprairiepress.org/fgr/vol51/iss1/6
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
