塞缪尔puf天真的审判法

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
V. Fiorillo
{"title":"塞缪尔puf天真的审判法","authors":"V. Fiorillo","doi":"10.25162/arsp-2020-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present essay intends to reconstruct the fundamental function of the juridical-formal procedure, carried out by equity in Samuel Pufendorf ’s legal theory, aiming at the adequate application of the positive norm to an exceptional case. To this end, equity conveys the moral contents of the natural law within the positive one, especially if the latter presents gaps or is in contradiction with the former. The essay also examines the characteristics of the equitable judgement, conceived by Pufendorf in the form of the rhetorical syllogism or enthymeme, operating within the moral discipline of prudentia. As such, equity is therefore closely linked to the pufendorfian methodological question if man’s free action is measurable with the exact mathematical criteria or with the most approximate equitable ones. In this methodological context, Pufendorf interprets equity as the criterion for measuring the moral quantity of an action.","PeriodicalId":41477,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","volume":"69 1","pages":"509-531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Billigkeit, Klugheit und moralische Quantität der Handlung in Samuel Pufendorfs Rechtslehre\",\"authors\":\"V. Fiorillo\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/arsp-2020-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present essay intends to reconstruct the fundamental function of the juridical-formal procedure, carried out by equity in Samuel Pufendorf ’s legal theory, aiming at the adequate application of the positive norm to an exceptional case. To this end, equity conveys the moral contents of the natural law within the positive one, especially if the latter presents gaps or is in contradiction with the former. The essay also examines the characteristics of the equitable judgement, conceived by Pufendorf in the form of the rhetorical syllogism or enthymeme, operating within the moral discipline of prudentia. As such, equity is therefore closely linked to the pufendorfian methodological question if man’s free action is measurable with the exact mathematical criteria or with the most approximate equitable ones. In this methodological context, Pufendorf interprets equity as the criterion for measuring the moral quantity of an action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"509-531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2020-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2020-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在重构普芬多夫法律理论中由衡平法执行的司法形式程序的基本功能,以期在例外情况下充分运用实证规范。为此,衡平法在实在法中传递着自然法的道德内容,特别是在实在法与自然法存在差距或矛盾的情况下。本文还考察了公平判断的特征,由普芬多夫以修辞三段论或推理推理的形式构思,在审慎的道德纪律中运作。因此,公平因此与普芬多的方法论问题密切相关,即人的自由行动是否可以用精确的数学标准或最近似的公平标准来衡量。在这种方法论背景下,Pufendorf将公平解释为衡量行为道德量的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Billigkeit, Klugheit und moralische Quantität der Handlung in Samuel Pufendorfs Rechtslehre
The present essay intends to reconstruct the fundamental function of the juridical-formal procedure, carried out by equity in Samuel Pufendorf ’s legal theory, aiming at the adequate application of the positive norm to an exceptional case. To this end, equity conveys the moral contents of the natural law within the positive one, especially if the latter presents gaps or is in contradiction with the former. The essay also examines the characteristics of the equitable judgement, conceived by Pufendorf in the form of the rhetorical syllogism or enthymeme, operating within the moral discipline of prudentia. As such, equity is therefore closely linked to the pufendorfian methodological question if man’s free action is measurable with the exact mathematical criteria or with the most approximate equitable ones. In this methodological context, Pufendorf interprets equity as the criterion for measuring the moral quantity of an action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信