基于可用性量表和可用性测试方法的InDriver和Maxim应用程序可用性质量评价

Janet Livia Tuwanakotta, Andeka Rocky Tanaamah
{"title":"基于可用性量表和可用性测试方法的InDriver和Maxim应用程序可用性质量评价","authors":"Janet Livia Tuwanakotta, Andeka Rocky Tanaamah","doi":"10.32520/stmsi.v11i3.2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indriver application and Maxim application are international companies engaged in Information Technology where the company provides a platform that brings drivers and customers together quickly. Both applications come from Russia. These two applications are growing rapidly so they have been downloaded more than 5 million times through the Google Play store. Although it has been downloaded more than 5 million times, some users complain about the two applications. From some of the user feedback, the InDriver application and Maxim application still have problems that occur in their users. This problem is part of the usability problems that exist in both applications. So it is necessary to dig into a more comprehensive problem to explore the problems that occur in both applications. You also need to know the level of usability of these two applications. The level of usability needs to be known to explain the usability of these two applications is already at which level from the user side. This study provides an evaluation to determine the usability problems and the level of usability that exist in both applications using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability Testing methods. The results of this study indicate that the features of the Maxim application are still http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id not accepted by users seen from the sus questionnaire score of 48.3 and on the rating scale including the F rating with a smaller score of 51 so that it can be concluded that the Maxim application is not included in the acceptable category but not acceptable and the InDriver application has a SUS score of 51.25. On the rating scale, the InDriver application is included in the F rating so it can be concluded that the InDriver application is not included in the acceptable category but the low category.","PeriodicalId":32367,"journal":{"name":"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Usability Quality Between InDriver and Maxim Applications Using Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability Testing Methods\",\"authors\":\"Janet Livia Tuwanakotta, Andeka Rocky Tanaamah\",\"doi\":\"10.32520/stmsi.v11i3.2001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indriver application and Maxim application are international companies engaged in Information Technology where the company provides a platform that brings drivers and customers together quickly. Both applications come from Russia. These two applications are growing rapidly so they have been downloaded more than 5 million times through the Google Play store. Although it has been downloaded more than 5 million times, some users complain about the two applications. From some of the user feedback, the InDriver application and Maxim application still have problems that occur in their users. This problem is part of the usability problems that exist in both applications. So it is necessary to dig into a more comprehensive problem to explore the problems that occur in both applications. You also need to know the level of usability of these two applications. The level of usability needs to be known to explain the usability of these two applications is already at which level from the user side. This study provides an evaluation to determine the usability problems and the level of usability that exist in both applications using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability Testing methods. The results of this study indicate that the features of the Maxim application are still http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id not accepted by users seen from the sus questionnaire score of 48.3 and on the rating scale including the F rating with a smaller score of 51 so that it can be concluded that the Maxim application is not included in the acceptable category but not acceptable and the InDriver application has a SUS score of 51.25. On the rating scale, the InDriver application is included in the F rating so it can be concluded that the InDriver application is not included in the acceptable category but the low category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v11i3.2001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sistemasi Jurnal Sistem Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v11i3.2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Indriver应用和Maxim应用是一家从事信息技术的国际公司,公司提供了一个将司机和客户快速联系在一起的平台。这两份申请都来自俄罗斯。这两款应用发展迅速,在谷歌Play商店的下载量已超过500万次。尽管这款应用的下载量已超过500万次,但仍有一些用户对这两款应用表示不满。从一些用户反馈来看,InDriver应用和Maxim应用仍然存在用户出现的问题。这个问题是存在于这两个应用程序中的可用性问题的一部分。因此,有必要深入研究一个更全面的问题,探讨在这两种应用中出现的问题。您还需要知道这两个应用程序的可用性水平。用户需要知道可用性的级别,以解释这两个应用程序的可用性已经处于哪个级别。本研究使用系统可用性量表(SUS)和可用性测试方法,对两种应用程序中存在的可用性问题和可用性水平进行了评估。本研究的结果表明,从sus问卷得分48.3分和包含分数较小的F分51分的评分量表来看,Maxim应用程序的功能仍然http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id不被用户接受,因此可以得出结论,Maxim应用程序不属于可接受类别,但不被接受,InDriver应用程序的sus得分为51.25分。在评级量表上,InDriver应用程序被包括在F评级中,因此可以得出结论,InDriver应用程序不包括在可接受的类别中,而是低类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Usability Quality Between InDriver and Maxim Applications Using Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability Testing Methods
Indriver application and Maxim application are international companies engaged in Information Technology where the company provides a platform that brings drivers and customers together quickly. Both applications come from Russia. These two applications are growing rapidly so they have been downloaded more than 5 million times through the Google Play store. Although it has been downloaded more than 5 million times, some users complain about the two applications. From some of the user feedback, the InDriver application and Maxim application still have problems that occur in their users. This problem is part of the usability problems that exist in both applications. So it is necessary to dig into a more comprehensive problem to explore the problems that occur in both applications. You also need to know the level of usability of these two applications. The level of usability needs to be known to explain the usability of these two applications is already at which level from the user side. This study provides an evaluation to determine the usability problems and the level of usability that exist in both applications using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability Testing methods. The results of this study indicate that the features of the Maxim application are still http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id not accepted by users seen from the sus questionnaire score of 48.3 and on the rating scale including the F rating with a smaller score of 51 so that it can be concluded that the Maxim application is not included in the acceptable category but not acceptable and the InDriver application has a SUS score of 51.25. On the rating scale, the InDriver application is included in the F rating so it can be concluded that the InDriver application is not included in the acceptable category but the low category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
43 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信