精神科药物也不再有效

R. Braithwaite
{"title":"精神科药物也不再有效","authors":"R. Braithwaite","doi":"10.1192/PB.37.12.403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Martin & Elworthy report that the biggest reason for prescribing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) less frequently than before is the perception among psychiatrists that ‘more effective medication’ now exists.[1][1] Unfortunately, the authors collude with this exaggerated view, claiming that ‘","PeriodicalId":89639,"journal":{"name":"The psychiatrist","volume":"41 1","pages":"403-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychiatric medications are no more effective\",\"authors\":\"R. Braithwaite\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/PB.37.12.403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Martin & Elworthy report that the biggest reason for prescribing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) less frequently than before is the perception among psychiatrists that ‘more effective medication’ now exists.[1][1] Unfortunately, the authors collude with this exaggerated view, claiming that ‘\",\"PeriodicalId\":89639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"403-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The psychiatrist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.37.12.403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The psychiatrist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.37.12.403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马丁和埃尔沃西报告说,电痉挛疗法(ECT)的处方比以前少的最大原因是精神科医生认为现在有“更有效的药物”。[1][1]不幸的是,作者与这种夸大的观点串通一气,声称“
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychiatric medications are no more effective
Martin & Elworthy report that the biggest reason for prescribing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) less frequently than before is the perception among psychiatrists that ‘more effective medication’ now exists.[1][1] Unfortunately, the authors collude with this exaggerated view, claiming that ‘
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信