结语:作为集合的相互作用的材料,行动的语法和现象学活动

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anne Marie Guerrettaz
{"title":"结语:作为集合的相互作用的材料,行动的语法和现象学活动","authors":"Anne Marie Guerrettaz","doi":"10.1080/19463014.2021.1883255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This coda begins by briefly discussing the constructs at the heart of this special issue – materials use, classroom discourse, materiality, and materials – highlighting how the compilation contributes to the expanding definition of language learning and teaching materials. I then discuss two interrelated guiding questions of this compilation – how materials and discourse influence one another – and posit that an important first step for the field is conceptualising the nature of materials-in-interaction (i.e., the materials-discourse interface). The majority of the article then goes on to explore three ways of (re)conceptualising and studying materials use with a focus on the materials-interaction interface, examples of which are identifiable across the empirical articles of the issue. These include reconceptualizations of ‘materials use’ as: 1) assemblages, 2), ‘grammars of action’ and 3) ‘phenomenological activity’. The first two are somewhat novel concepts in language education research. The third, ‘activity’, is a ‘common sense’ construct in the field which has surprising not been well defined from an empirical, ‘phenomenological’, and ‘theoretically neutral’ perspective. The article concludes with a brief discussion about aspects of ‘materials use’ that are evident in all three conceptualisations of materials-in-interaction.","PeriodicalId":45350,"journal":{"name":"Classroom Discourse","volume":"44 1","pages":"168 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coda: materials-in-interaction as assemblages, grammars of action, and phenomenological activity\",\"authors\":\"Anne Marie Guerrettaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19463014.2021.1883255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This coda begins by briefly discussing the constructs at the heart of this special issue – materials use, classroom discourse, materiality, and materials – highlighting how the compilation contributes to the expanding definition of language learning and teaching materials. I then discuss two interrelated guiding questions of this compilation – how materials and discourse influence one another – and posit that an important first step for the field is conceptualising the nature of materials-in-interaction (i.e., the materials-discourse interface). The majority of the article then goes on to explore three ways of (re)conceptualising and studying materials use with a focus on the materials-interaction interface, examples of which are identifiable across the empirical articles of the issue. These include reconceptualizations of ‘materials use’ as: 1) assemblages, 2), ‘grammars of action’ and 3) ‘phenomenological activity’. The first two are somewhat novel concepts in language education research. The third, ‘activity’, is a ‘common sense’ construct in the field which has surprising not been well defined from an empirical, ‘phenomenological’, and ‘theoretically neutral’ perspective. The article concludes with a brief discussion about aspects of ‘materials use’ that are evident in all three conceptualisations of materials-in-interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classroom Discourse\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"168 - 190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classroom Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1883255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classroom Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1883255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本结束语首先简要讨论了本期专题的核心结构——材料使用、课堂话语、材料性和材料——强调了汇编如何有助于扩展语言学习和教学材料的定义。然后,我讨论了本汇编的两个相互关联的指导问题-材料和话语如何相互影响-并假设该领域重要的第一步是概念化材料相互作用的本质(即材料-话语界面)。文章的大部分接着探讨了三种(重新)概念化和研究材料使用的方法,重点是材料交互界面,这些方法的例子在本期的实证文章中可以辨认出来。这些包括对“材料使用”的重新概念化:1)组合,2)“行动语法”和3)“现象学活动”。前两者是语言教育研究中比较新颖的概念。第三,“活动”是该领域的“常识”结构,令人惊讶的是,它没有从经验、“现象学”和“理论中立”的角度得到很好的定义。文章最后简要讨论了“材料使用”的各个方面,这些方面在材料交互的所有三个概念中都很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coda: materials-in-interaction as assemblages, grammars of action, and phenomenological activity
ABSTRACT This coda begins by briefly discussing the constructs at the heart of this special issue – materials use, classroom discourse, materiality, and materials – highlighting how the compilation contributes to the expanding definition of language learning and teaching materials. I then discuss two interrelated guiding questions of this compilation – how materials and discourse influence one another – and posit that an important first step for the field is conceptualising the nature of materials-in-interaction (i.e., the materials-discourse interface). The majority of the article then goes on to explore three ways of (re)conceptualising and studying materials use with a focus on the materials-interaction interface, examples of which are identifiable across the empirical articles of the issue. These include reconceptualizations of ‘materials use’ as: 1) assemblages, 2), ‘grammars of action’ and 3) ‘phenomenological activity’. The first two are somewhat novel concepts in language education research. The third, ‘activity’, is a ‘common sense’ construct in the field which has surprising not been well defined from an empirical, ‘phenomenological’, and ‘theoretically neutral’ perspective. The article concludes with a brief discussion about aspects of ‘materials use’ that are evident in all three conceptualisations of materials-in-interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Classroom Discourse
Classroom Discourse EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信