乳腺癌筛查中引起回忆的区域与人工智能发现之间的对应关系

Victor Dahlblom, A. Tingberg, S. Zackrisson, M. Dustler
{"title":"乳腺癌筛查中引起回忆的区域与人工智能发现之间的对应关系","authors":"Victor Dahlblom, A. Tingberg, S. Zackrisson, M. Dustler","doi":"10.1117/12.2625731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"False positive recall is a major issue in breast cancer screening and the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) might affect which women who are unnecessarily recalled. We have investigated how an AI system works on false positive recalls at screening and compared with radiologist findings. Two-view digital mammography (DM) examinations from 656 recalled women (136 with screening detected cancer), were analysed with a commercial AI system. The AI findings were matched with the areas on the images causing the recalls. The agreement was studied both at the examination level and for individual findings. Scores were compared between true positive and false positive recalls. ROC analysis was used to study the AI-system’s ability to distinguish between true and false positive recalls. It was also studied how the AI system performed on cases where there were discordant readings. AI identified the same areas as radiologists in 80% of the cases recalled on DM. For true positives both the proportion of matching areas and AI scores were higher than for false positive recalls. The AI system also had a relatively large AUC (0.83) for differentiating between false positive recalls and cancers. Further, the AI system identified most of the findings leading to recall in cases where only one of the readers had marked the case for discussion. There is a relatively large agreement between the AI system and radiologists. The AI system scores the false positives lower than true positives. AI complements a single reader in a way similar to a second reader.","PeriodicalId":92005,"journal":{"name":"Breast imaging : 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 8-11, 2012 : proceedings. International Workshop on Breast Imaging (11th : 2012 : Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"7 1","pages":"122860K - 122860K-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correspondence between areas causing recall in breast cancer screening and artificial intelligence findings\",\"authors\":\"Victor Dahlblom, A. Tingberg, S. Zackrisson, M. Dustler\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2625731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"False positive recall is a major issue in breast cancer screening and the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) might affect which women who are unnecessarily recalled. We have investigated how an AI system works on false positive recalls at screening and compared with radiologist findings. Two-view digital mammography (DM) examinations from 656 recalled women (136 with screening detected cancer), were analysed with a commercial AI system. The AI findings were matched with the areas on the images causing the recalls. The agreement was studied both at the examination level and for individual findings. Scores were compared between true positive and false positive recalls. ROC analysis was used to study the AI-system’s ability to distinguish between true and false positive recalls. It was also studied how the AI system performed on cases where there were discordant readings. AI identified the same areas as radiologists in 80% of the cases recalled on DM. For true positives both the proportion of matching areas and AI scores were higher than for false positive recalls. The AI system also had a relatively large AUC (0.83) for differentiating between false positive recalls and cancers. Further, the AI system identified most of the findings leading to recall in cases where only one of the readers had marked the case for discussion. There is a relatively large agreement between the AI system and radiologists. The AI system scores the false positives lower than true positives. AI complements a single reader in a way similar to a second reader.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast imaging : 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 8-11, 2012 : proceedings. International Workshop on Breast Imaging (11th : 2012 : Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"122860K - 122860K-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast imaging : 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 8-11, 2012 : proceedings. International Workshop on Breast Imaging (11th : 2012 : Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2625731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast imaging : 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, Philadelphia, PA, USA, July 8-11, 2012 : proceedings. International Workshop on Breast Imaging (11th : 2012 : Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2625731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假阳性召回是乳腺癌筛查中的一个主要问题,人工智能(AI)的引入可能会影响哪些女性被不必要地召回。我们研究了人工智能系统如何处理筛查时的假阳性回忆,并将其与放射科医生的发现进行了比较。通过商业人工智能系统分析了656名被召回女性(136名筛查出癌症)的双视图数字乳房x光检查(DM)。人工智能的发现与导致召回的图像上的区域相匹配。在审查一级和个别调查结果方面都对该协定进行了研究。比较真阳性和假阳性回忆的得分。使用ROC分析来研究人工智能系统区分真阳性和假阳性回忆的能力。研究人员还研究了人工智能系统在读数不一致的情况下的表现。人工智能识别出与放射科医生相同的区域,在80%的DM回忆病例中。对于真阳性,匹配区域的比例和人工智能得分都高于假阳性回忆。人工智能系统在区分假阳性回忆和癌症方面也有相对较大的AUC(0.83)。此外,在只有一位读者标记了讨论案例的情况下,人工智能系统识别了大多数导致召回的发现。人工智能系统和放射科医生之间有一个相对较大的共识。人工智能系统对假阳性的评分低于真阳性。AI以类似于第二个阅读器的方式补充单个阅读器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correspondence between areas causing recall in breast cancer screening and artificial intelligence findings
False positive recall is a major issue in breast cancer screening and the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) might affect which women who are unnecessarily recalled. We have investigated how an AI system works on false positive recalls at screening and compared with radiologist findings. Two-view digital mammography (DM) examinations from 656 recalled women (136 with screening detected cancer), were analysed with a commercial AI system. The AI findings were matched with the areas on the images causing the recalls. The agreement was studied both at the examination level and for individual findings. Scores were compared between true positive and false positive recalls. ROC analysis was used to study the AI-system’s ability to distinguish between true and false positive recalls. It was also studied how the AI system performed on cases where there were discordant readings. AI identified the same areas as radiologists in 80% of the cases recalled on DM. For true positives both the proportion of matching areas and AI scores were higher than for false positive recalls. The AI system also had a relatively large AUC (0.83) for differentiating between false positive recalls and cancers. Further, the AI system identified most of the findings leading to recall in cases where only one of the readers had marked the case for discussion. There is a relatively large agreement between the AI system and radiologists. The AI system scores the false positives lower than true positives. AI complements a single reader in a way similar to a second reader.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信