使用多室模型作为参考方法评估儿童和青少年体脂的有效性:系统综述

Danilo R.P. Silva , Alex S. Ribeiro , Fernando H. Pavão , Enio R.V. Ronque , Ademar Avelar , Analiza M. Silva , Edilson S. Cyrino
{"title":"使用多室模型作为参考方法评估儿童和青少年体脂的有效性:系统综述","authors":"Danilo R.P. Silva ,&nbsp;Alex S. Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Fernando H. Pavão ,&nbsp;Enio R.V. Ronque ,&nbsp;Ademar Avelar ,&nbsp;Analiza M. Silva ,&nbsp;Edilson S. Cyrino","doi":"10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70507-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the validity of methods to assess body fat in children and adolescents using a systematic review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The search was performed by two independent researchers using the MEDLINE, BioMed Central, SciELO, and LILACS electronic databases. For inclusion, the articles should have been written in English or Portuguese, and must have used multi-compartment models as the criterion measure of the model, with body fat measurement of the whole body in non-athlete children and adolescents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A preliminary search resulted in 832 studies. After all selection steps were performed, 12 articles were included. The selected studies were published between 1997 and 2010, whose samples consisted of children and adolescents with levels of relative body fat ranging from 20.7% to 41.4%. The methods used were: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (58.3%), isotope dilution (41.6%), skinfold thickness (33.3%), hydrostatic weighing (25%), bioelectrical impedance analysis (25%), air displacement plethysmography (16.6%), and total body electrical conductivity (8.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on the analysis of the studies, isotope dilution and air displacement plethysmography methods were the most reliable, despite the limited number of studies. As for clinical use or for population-based studies, the equation of Slaughter et al. (1988), which uses the triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, showed the best results for assessment of body fat in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101100,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)","volume":"59 5","pages":"Pages 475-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70507-1","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the methods to assess body fat in children and adolescents using multi-compartment models as the reference method: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Danilo R.P. Silva ,&nbsp;Alex S. Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Fernando H. Pavão ,&nbsp;Enio R.V. Ronque ,&nbsp;Ademar Avelar ,&nbsp;Analiza M. Silva ,&nbsp;Edilson S. Cyrino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70507-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To analyze the validity of methods to assess body fat in children and adolescents using a systematic review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The search was performed by two independent researchers using the MEDLINE, BioMed Central, SciELO, and LILACS electronic databases. For inclusion, the articles should have been written in English or Portuguese, and must have used multi-compartment models as the criterion measure of the model, with body fat measurement of the whole body in non-athlete children and adolescents.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A preliminary search resulted in 832 studies. After all selection steps were performed, 12 articles were included. The selected studies were published between 1997 and 2010, whose samples consisted of children and adolescents with levels of relative body fat ranging from 20.7% to 41.4%. The methods used were: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (58.3%), isotope dilution (41.6%), skinfold thickness (33.3%), hydrostatic weighing (25%), bioelectrical impedance analysis (25%), air displacement plethysmography (16.6%), and total body electrical conductivity (8.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on the analysis of the studies, isotope dilution and air displacement plethysmography methods were the most reliable, despite the limited number of studies. As for clinical use or for population-based studies, the equation of Slaughter et al. (1988), which uses the triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, showed the best results for assessment of body fat in this population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 475-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70507-1\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255482313705071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255482313705071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的采用系统评价法分析儿童青少年体脂评价方法的有效性。方法由两名独立研究者使用MEDLINE、BioMed Central、SciELO和LILACS电子数据库进行检索。纳入的文章必须用英语或葡萄牙语撰写,并且必须使用多室模型作为模型的标准测量,非运动员儿童和青少年的全身体脂测量。结果初步检索得到832项研究。完成所有选择步骤后,纳入12篇文章。所选的研究发表于1997年至2010年之间,其样本包括相对体脂水平在20.7%至41.4%之间的儿童和青少年。采用双能x线吸收法(58.3%)、同位素稀释法(41.6%)、皮襞厚度法(33.3%)、静压称重法(25%)、生物电阻抗法(25%)、空气置换容积脉搏波法(16.6%)、全身电导率法(8.3%)。结论虽然研究数量有限,但同位素稀释法和空气置换法是最可靠的方法。至于临床应用或基于人群的研究,Slaughter等人(1988)使用肱三头肌和肩胛下皮褶厚度的方程显示了评估该人群体脂的最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of the methods to assess body fat in children and adolescents using multi-compartment models as the reference method: a systematic review

Objective

To analyze the validity of methods to assess body fat in children and adolescents using a systematic review.

Methods

The search was performed by two independent researchers using the MEDLINE, BioMed Central, SciELO, and LILACS electronic databases. For inclusion, the articles should have been written in English or Portuguese, and must have used multi-compartment models as the criterion measure of the model, with body fat measurement of the whole body in non-athlete children and adolescents.

Results

A preliminary search resulted in 832 studies. After all selection steps were performed, 12 articles were included. The selected studies were published between 1997 and 2010, whose samples consisted of children and adolescents with levels of relative body fat ranging from 20.7% to 41.4%. The methods used were: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (58.3%), isotope dilution (41.6%), skinfold thickness (33.3%), hydrostatic weighing (25%), bioelectrical impedance analysis (25%), air displacement plethysmography (16.6%), and total body electrical conductivity (8.3%).

Conclusions

Based on the analysis of the studies, isotope dilution and air displacement plethysmography methods were the most reliable, despite the limited number of studies. As for clinical use or for population-based studies, the equation of Slaughter et al. (1988), which uses the triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, showed the best results for assessment of body fat in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信