{"title":"公众适应","authors":"W. Hudson","doi":"10.1145/601798.601810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"January/February 2003 8 October 2002 saw the addition of two new pieces to the jigsaw puzzle that is web accessibility case law in the US. Unfortunately, one of them does not fit. In the first ruling of its kind, U.S. District Judge Patricia Seitz found that Southwest Airlines did not have to modify its web site to meet the needs of a blind user, Robert Gumson. But only a week later and a few states away, Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. ruled that Atlanta's Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) would have to change its site to provide timetable information to visually impaired users. Needless to say this situation was more than a little confusing to anyone involved in web site design and development.","PeriodicalId":7070,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigchi Bulletin","volume":"69 1","pages":"8 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public accomodation\",\"authors\":\"W. Hudson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/601798.601810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"January/February 2003 8 October 2002 saw the addition of two new pieces to the jigsaw puzzle that is web accessibility case law in the US. Unfortunately, one of them does not fit. In the first ruling of its kind, U.S. District Judge Patricia Seitz found that Southwest Airlines did not have to modify its web site to meet the needs of a blind user, Robert Gumson. But only a week later and a few states away, Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. ruled that Atlanta's Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) would have to change its site to provide timetable information to visually impaired users. Needless to say this situation was more than a little confusing to anyone involved in web site design and development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigchi Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"8 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigchi Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/601798.601810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigchi Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/601798.601810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
2003年1月/ 2月2002年10月8日，美国的网页无障碍判例法拼图中又增加了两个新部分。不幸的是，其中一个不合适。美国地区法官帕特里夏·塞茨(Patricia Seitz)在这类案件中首次裁定，西南航空公司不必修改其网站以满足盲人用户罗伯特·古姆森(Robert Gumson)的需求。但仅仅一周后，在几个州之外，法官托马斯·w·斯拉什(Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.)裁定亚特兰大大都会亚特兰大快速交通管理局(MARTA)必须更改其网站，以便为视障用户提供时间表信息。不用说，这种情况对任何参与网站设计和开发的人来说都是有点困惑的。
January/February 2003 8 October 2002 saw the addition of two new pieces to the jigsaw puzzle that is web accessibility case law in the US. Unfortunately, one of them does not fit. In the first ruling of its kind, U.S. District Judge Patricia Seitz found that Southwest Airlines did not have to modify its web site to meet the needs of a blind user, Robert Gumson. But only a week later and a few states away, Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. ruled that Atlanta's Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) would have to change its site to provide timetable information to visually impaired users. Needless to say this situation was more than a little confusing to anyone involved in web site design and development.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
