Oyo州公共考试监考员考试和评价道德的因果模型

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
A. Jinadu
{"title":"Oyo州公共考试监考员考试和评价道德的因果模型","authors":"A. Jinadu","doi":"10.1108/agjsr-01-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeUpholding assessment ethics are common concerns during annual public examination performance appraisal. Previous studies have focused more on examination stakeholder: testees outside proctors however, assessment ethics cannot be studied excluding proctors variables therefore, the study investigated consistency of a structural equation modelling of security, environment, professionalism, testing and assessment ethics.Design/methodology/approachEx-post facto design was adopted. Simple random sampling technique was employed to choose 90 proctors drawn from 45 colleges. Proctors Examination Ethics Questionnaire (reliability = 0.86) was used to collect data for the study. Data collected were analysed using path analysis at 0.05 significant levels.FindingsOut of the six hypothesised paths significantly explaining the consistency of the causal model. Test security, environment and professionalism accounted for both direct and indirect effects on assessment ethics. All model fit indices were established to explain testing and assessment model.Research limitations/implicationsFew proctor variables were studied, therefore assessment ethics may not be explained other than through proctor variables considered in this study.Practical implicationsAssessment ethics may not be violated if test security, testing environment and professionalism are not cared for during test administration as shown in the study.Social implicationsIt added to knowledge base in ethical areas of assessment, a 21st-century proctors in upholding testing and assessment ethics, security, environment and professionalism are to be considered.Originality/valueThere was a positive causal effect of security, environment and professionalism on testing and assessment ethics among proctors in public examinations.","PeriodicalId":50978,"journal":{"name":"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal modelling of testing and assessment ethics among proctors of public examinations in Oyo state\",\"authors\":\"A. Jinadu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/agjsr-01-2023-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeUpholding assessment ethics are common concerns during annual public examination performance appraisal. Previous studies have focused more on examination stakeholder: testees outside proctors however, assessment ethics cannot be studied excluding proctors variables therefore, the study investigated consistency of a structural equation modelling of security, environment, professionalism, testing and assessment ethics.Design/methodology/approachEx-post facto design was adopted. Simple random sampling technique was employed to choose 90 proctors drawn from 45 colleges. Proctors Examination Ethics Questionnaire (reliability = 0.86) was used to collect data for the study. Data collected were analysed using path analysis at 0.05 significant levels.FindingsOut of the six hypothesised paths significantly explaining the consistency of the causal model. Test security, environment and professionalism accounted for both direct and indirect effects on assessment ethics. All model fit indices were established to explain testing and assessment model.Research limitations/implicationsFew proctor variables were studied, therefore assessment ethics may not be explained other than through proctor variables considered in this study.Practical implicationsAssessment ethics may not be violated if test security, testing environment and professionalism are not cared for during test administration as shown in the study.Social implicationsIt added to knowledge base in ethical areas of assessment, a 21st-century proctors in upholding testing and assessment ethics, security, environment and professionalism are to be considered.Originality/valueThere was a positive causal effect of security, environment and professionalism on testing and assessment ethics among proctors in public examinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-01-2023-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-01-2023-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的坚持评估伦理是年度公开考试绩效评估中普遍关注的问题。以往的研究更多地关注考试利益相关者:监考人员之外的被考生,然而,评估伦理不能排除监考变量进行研究,因此,本研究考察了安全、环境、专业、测试和评估伦理的结构方程模型的一致性。设计/方法/方法采用事后设计。采用简单随机抽样的方法,从45所高校抽取90名监考人员。采用信度为0.86的《监考伦理问卷》收集研究资料。收集的数据采用通径分析,在0.05显著水平上进行分析。六个假设路径中的发现显著地解释了因果模型的一致性。考试安全、考试环境和考试专业性对考试伦理有直接和间接的影响。建立各模型拟合指标来解释检验和评价模型。研究的局限性/意义研究的普洛克变量很少,因此评估伦理可能无法通过本研究中考虑的普洛克变量来解释。实际意义如本研究所示,如果在考试管理过程中没有注意到考试的安全性、考试环境和专业性,也不会违反考试伦理。社会影响在考评伦理领域的知识基础上,将考虑21世纪考生在维护考试和考评伦理、安全、环境和专业方面的表现。独创性/价值安全、环境和专业对公开考试监考人员的考试和评价道德有正向的因果影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal modelling of testing and assessment ethics among proctors of public examinations in Oyo state
PurposeUpholding assessment ethics are common concerns during annual public examination performance appraisal. Previous studies have focused more on examination stakeholder: testees outside proctors however, assessment ethics cannot be studied excluding proctors variables therefore, the study investigated consistency of a structural equation modelling of security, environment, professionalism, testing and assessment ethics.Design/methodology/approachEx-post facto design was adopted. Simple random sampling technique was employed to choose 90 proctors drawn from 45 colleges. Proctors Examination Ethics Questionnaire (reliability = 0.86) was used to collect data for the study. Data collected were analysed using path analysis at 0.05 significant levels.FindingsOut of the six hypothesised paths significantly explaining the consistency of the causal model. Test security, environment and professionalism accounted for both direct and indirect effects on assessment ethics. All model fit indices were established to explain testing and assessment model.Research limitations/implicationsFew proctor variables were studied, therefore assessment ethics may not be explained other than through proctor variables considered in this study.Practical implicationsAssessment ethics may not be violated if test security, testing environment and professionalism are not cared for during test administration as shown in the study.Social implicationsIt added to knowledge base in ethical areas of assessment, a 21st-century proctors in upholding testing and assessment ethics, security, environment and professionalism are to be considered.Originality/valueThere was a positive causal effect of security, environment and professionalism on testing and assessment ethics among proctors in public examinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research
Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信