心理学和心理学家寻找身份:我们是什么,我们是谁,为什么重要?

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
C. Wagstaff, A. Quartiroli
{"title":"心理学和心理学家寻找身份:我们是什么,我们是谁,为什么重要?","authors":"C. Wagstaff, A. Quartiroli","doi":"10.1080/21520704.2020.1833124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The field of sport psychology has faced a challenge in its professional formation, to the extent that some scholars have argued that its status as a healthy, sustainable, or viable profession is an illusion. Within the discipline, there continues to be a range of professional qualifications, educational and training pathways, and labels used to define the study and application of sport psychology. This diversity is a by-product of complex legal, social, political, cultural, and contextual issues characterizing the world of sport psychology. We argue that there exist multiple – or perhaps fragmented – professional identities within sport psychology and that this has led to confusion and a lack of regulation across the field as a whole, and may contribute to unethical, ineffective, and unclear service delivery and pose challenge for the development of personal practitioner identity. Considering these observations, we call on scholars to study professional identity within sport psychology and how it is conceptualized, experienced, and implemented by professionals in practice.","PeriodicalId":45448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Psychology in Action","volume":"20 1","pages":"254 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychology and Psychologists in Search of an Identity: What and Who are we, and Why Does It Matter?\",\"authors\":\"C. Wagstaff, A. Quartiroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21520704.2020.1833124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The field of sport psychology has faced a challenge in its professional formation, to the extent that some scholars have argued that its status as a healthy, sustainable, or viable profession is an illusion. Within the discipline, there continues to be a range of professional qualifications, educational and training pathways, and labels used to define the study and application of sport psychology. This diversity is a by-product of complex legal, social, political, cultural, and contextual issues characterizing the world of sport psychology. We argue that there exist multiple – or perhaps fragmented – professional identities within sport psychology and that this has led to confusion and a lack of regulation across the field as a whole, and may contribute to unethical, ineffective, and unclear service delivery and pose challenge for the development of personal practitioner identity. Considering these observations, we call on scholars to study professional identity within sport psychology and how it is conceptualized, experienced, and implemented by professionals in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Psychology in Action\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"254 - 265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Psychology in Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2020.1833124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Psychology in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2020.1833124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要:运动心理学领域在其专业化形成过程中面临着挑战,以至于一些学者认为其作为一个健康、可持续或可行的专业的地位是一种错觉。在这门学科中,仍然有一系列的专业资格、教育和培训途径,以及用于定义运动心理学研究和应用的标签。这种多样性是复杂的法律、社会、政治、文化和背景问题的副产品,是运动心理学世界的特征。我们认为,在运动心理学中存在着多种或分散的专业身份,这导致了整个领域的混乱和缺乏监管,并可能导致不道德、无效和不明确的服务提供,并对个人从业者身份的发展构成挑战。考虑到这些观察结果,我们呼吁学者们研究运动心理学中的职业认同,以及专业人士在实践中如何概念化、体验和实施职业认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychology and Psychologists in Search of an Identity: What and Who are we, and Why Does It Matter?
Abstract The field of sport psychology has faced a challenge in its professional formation, to the extent that some scholars have argued that its status as a healthy, sustainable, or viable profession is an illusion. Within the discipline, there continues to be a range of professional qualifications, educational and training pathways, and labels used to define the study and application of sport psychology. This diversity is a by-product of complex legal, social, political, cultural, and contextual issues characterizing the world of sport psychology. We argue that there exist multiple – or perhaps fragmented – professional identities within sport psychology and that this has led to confusion and a lack of regulation across the field as a whole, and may contribute to unethical, ineffective, and unclear service delivery and pose challenge for the development of personal practitioner identity. Considering these observations, we call on scholars to study professional identity within sport psychology and how it is conceptualized, experienced, and implemented by professionals in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信