对比手语和口语

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Sílvia Gabarró-López, L. Meurant
{"title":"对比手语和口语","authors":"Sílvia Gabarró-López, L. Meurant","doi":"10.1075/lic.00024.gab","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n For years, the study of spoken languages, on the basis of written and then also oral productions, was the only way\n to investigate the human language capacity. As an introduction to this first volume of Languages in Contrast\n devoted to the comparison of spoken and signed languages, we propose to look at the reasons for the late emergence of the\n consideration of signed languages and multimodality in language studies. Next, the main stages of the history of sign language\n research are summarized. We highlight the benefits of studying cross-modal and multimodal data, as opposed to the isolated\n investigation of signed or spoken languages, and point out the remaining methodological obstacles to this approach. This\n contextualization prefaces the presentation of the outline of the volume.","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasting signed and spoken languages\",\"authors\":\"Sílvia Gabarró-López, L. Meurant\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lic.00024.gab\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n For years, the study of spoken languages, on the basis of written and then also oral productions, was the only way\\n to investigate the human language capacity. As an introduction to this first volume of Languages in Contrast\\n devoted to the comparison of spoken and signed languages, we propose to look at the reasons for the late emergence of the\\n consideration of signed languages and multimodality in language studies. Next, the main stages of the history of sign language\\n research are summarized. We highlight the benefits of studying cross-modal and multimodal data, as opposed to the isolated\\n investigation of signed or spoken languages, and point out the remaining methodological obstacles to this approach. This\\n contextualization prefaces the presentation of the outline of the volume.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Languages in Contrast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00024.gab\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00024.gab","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多年来,在书面和口头作品的基础上研究口语,是研究人类语言能力的唯一途径。作为《语言对比》第一卷的介绍,我们将比较口语和手语,我们建议看看手语和多模态在语言研究中出现较晚的原因。其次,总结了手语研究史上的主要阶段。我们强调了研究跨模态和多模态数据的好处,而不是对手语或口语的孤立调查,并指出了这种方法的其余方法学障碍。这种语境化的序言介绍了该卷的大纲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrasting signed and spoken languages
For years, the study of spoken languages, on the basis of written and then also oral productions, was the only way to investigate the human language capacity. As an introduction to this first volume of Languages in Contrast devoted to the comparison of spoken and signed languages, we propose to look at the reasons for the late emergence of the consideration of signed languages and multimodality in language studies. Next, the main stages of the history of sign language research are summarized. We highlight the benefits of studying cross-modal and multimodal data, as opposed to the isolated investigation of signed or spoken languages, and point out the remaining methodological obstacles to this approach. This contextualization prefaces the presentation of the outline of the volume.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Languages in Contrast
Languages in Contrast LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信