通过测量冠骨水平比较带瓣和无瓣种植技术:一项前瞻性放射学试验

Ali J. Abdul-Saheb, Resha J. Abdul-Saheb, A. Fatihallah
{"title":"通过测量冠骨水平比较带瓣和无瓣种植技术:一项前瞻性放射学试验","authors":"Ali J. Abdul-Saheb, Resha J. Abdul-Saheb, A. Fatihallah","doi":"10.26477/IDJ.V37I2.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previously, the flapped dental implant surgery was the most common implant placement procedure. With the development of different implantation techniques, the flapless surgery is now available for implant placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the flapless surgical technique for implant placement on bone level compared with the flapped surgery technique with the aid of panoramic imaging. Materials and methods: The study comprised 10 patients, 20 dental implants investigated, two implants placed for each patient (one implant placed with a flapped procedure and the other with a flapless surgical technique). Utilizing panoramic view pre- and post-surgical treatment, the crestal bone level at different intervals (1 week, 4 weeks and 12 week) has been compared. Results: When comparing flapped and flapless implant surgical procedures at different time intervals, the flapless surgical technique showed less bone level reduction, on the other hand no significant results obtained when comparing the surgical techniques in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Conclusion: Flapless implant placement provides less bone level reduction compared with the flapped technique.","PeriodicalId":78326,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Flapped and Flapless Implant Techniques by Measuring Crestal Bone Level: A Prospective Radiographical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Ali J. Abdul-Saheb, Resha J. Abdul-Saheb, A. Fatihallah\",\"doi\":\"10.26477/IDJ.V37I2.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Previously, the flapped dental implant surgery was the most common implant placement procedure. With the development of different implantation techniques, the flapless surgery is now available for implant placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the flapless surgical technique for implant placement on bone level compared with the flapped surgery technique with the aid of panoramic imaging. Materials and methods: The study comprised 10 patients, 20 dental implants investigated, two implants placed for each patient (one implant placed with a flapped procedure and the other with a flapless surgical technique). Utilizing panoramic view pre- and post-surgical treatment, the crestal bone level at different intervals (1 week, 4 weeks and 12 week) has been compared. Results: When comparing flapped and flapless implant surgical procedures at different time intervals, the flapless surgical technique showed less bone level reduction, on the other hand no significant results obtained when comparing the surgical techniques in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Conclusion: Flapless implant placement provides less bone level reduction compared with the flapped technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraqi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraqi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26477/IDJ.V37I2.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/IDJ.V37I2.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:以前,皮瓣种植是最常见的种植方式。随着不同种植技术的发展,无瓣手术已成为种植体植入的可行方法。本研究的目的是在全景成像的辅助下,比较无瓣手术技术与有瓣手术技术在骨水平上的效果。材料和方法:本研究包括10例患者,调查了20个种植体,每位患者放置两个种植体(一个种植体采用带瓣手术,另一个种植体采用无瓣手术技术)。采用全景式手术前后治疗,比较不同时间间隔(1周、4周、12周)的嵴骨水平。结果:在不同时间间隔的有瓣与无瓣种植体手术方式比较中,无瓣术式的骨水平降低较少,而在上颌弓和下颌弓的手术方式比较中,无瓣术式的效果不显著。结论:无瓣种植体与有瓣种植体相比,减少骨水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Flapped and Flapless Implant Techniques by Measuring Crestal Bone Level: A Prospective Radiographical Trial
Background: Previously, the flapped dental implant surgery was the most common implant placement procedure. With the development of different implantation techniques, the flapless surgery is now available for implant placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the flapless surgical technique for implant placement on bone level compared with the flapped surgery technique with the aid of panoramic imaging. Materials and methods: The study comprised 10 patients, 20 dental implants investigated, two implants placed for each patient (one implant placed with a flapped procedure and the other with a flapless surgical technique). Utilizing panoramic view pre- and post-surgical treatment, the crestal bone level at different intervals (1 week, 4 weeks and 12 week) has been compared. Results: When comparing flapped and flapless implant surgical procedures at different time intervals, the flapless surgical technique showed less bone level reduction, on the other hand no significant results obtained when comparing the surgical techniques in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Conclusion: Flapless implant placement provides less bone level reduction compared with the flapped technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信