传统笼养系统与动物福利系统对低致病性禽流感支原体患病率及防护率的比较

Deok-Hwan Kim, Kyu-Jik Kim, Chang-Seon Song
{"title":"传统笼养系统与动物福利系统对低致病性禽流感支原体患病率及防护率的比较","authors":"Deok-Hwan Kim, Kyu-Jik Kim, Chang-Seon Song","doi":"10.5536/kjps.2019.46.4.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, consumers have recognized the issue of and expressed concern over farm animal welfare. Therefore, worldwide, chicken farms are transitioning from traditional caged breeding systems to welfare-oriented breeding systems. In this study, we further analyzed and compared the prevalence and protection rate of various diseases by challenging chickens under conventional and welfare-oriented breeding conditions with low pathogenic avian influenza. Ten chickens were randomly selected from each farm (conventional and welfare) from which Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) were identified and isolated. Additionally, low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) were challenged to broilers from each farm and samples were collected from these chickens using oral and cloacal swabs to investigate viral shedding and titer. The results showed that Mycoplasma infection did not significantly differ between breeding systems. Initially, LPAI viral shedding and titer significantly differed between breeding systems post-challenge, but as the experiment progressed, there was ultimately no significant difference. (","PeriodicalId":17845,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Mycoplasma Prevalence and Protection Rate of Low\\n Pathogenic Avian Influenza between Traditional Cage and Animal Welfare\\n Systems\",\"authors\":\"Deok-Hwan Kim, Kyu-Jik Kim, Chang-Seon Song\",\"doi\":\"10.5536/kjps.2019.46.4.271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, consumers have recognized the issue of and expressed concern over farm animal welfare. Therefore, worldwide, chicken farms are transitioning from traditional caged breeding systems to welfare-oriented breeding systems. In this study, we further analyzed and compared the prevalence and protection rate of various diseases by challenging chickens under conventional and welfare-oriented breeding conditions with low pathogenic avian influenza. Ten chickens were randomly selected from each farm (conventional and welfare) from which Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) were identified and isolated. Additionally, low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) were challenged to broilers from each farm and samples were collected from these chickens using oral and cloacal swabs to investigate viral shedding and titer. The results showed that Mycoplasma infection did not significantly differ between breeding systems. Initially, LPAI viral shedding and titer significantly differed between breeding systems post-challenge, but as the experiment progressed, there was ultimately no significant difference. (\",\"PeriodicalId\":17845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2019.46.4.271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2019.46.4.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,消费者已经认识到农场动物福利的问题,并表达了对农场动物福利的关注。因此,在世界范围内,养鸡场正在从传统的笼养养殖系统向福利导向的养殖系统过渡。在本研究中,我们进一步分析和比较了低致病性禽流感在传统和福利养殖条件下对鸡的各种疾病的患病率和保护率。在常规和福利两个养殖场随机选取10只鸡,分别鉴定分离鸡败病支原体(MG)和滑膜支原体(MS)。此外,对每个农场的肉鸡进行低致病性禽流感(LPAI)攻击,并使用口腔和肛肠拭子收集这些鸡的样本,以调查病毒的脱落和滴度。结果表明,支原体感染在不同养殖体系间无显著差异。最初,攻毒后LPAI病毒的脱落和滴度在不同的饲养系统之间存在显著差异,但随着实验的进行,最终没有显著差异。(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Mycoplasma Prevalence and Protection Rate of Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza between Traditional Cage and Animal Welfare Systems
In recent years, consumers have recognized the issue of and expressed concern over farm animal welfare. Therefore, worldwide, chicken farms are transitioning from traditional caged breeding systems to welfare-oriented breeding systems. In this study, we further analyzed and compared the prevalence and protection rate of various diseases by challenging chickens under conventional and welfare-oriented breeding conditions with low pathogenic avian influenza. Ten chickens were randomly selected from each farm (conventional and welfare) from which Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) were identified and isolated. Additionally, low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) were challenged to broilers from each farm and samples were collected from these chickens using oral and cloacal swabs to investigate viral shedding and titer. The results showed that Mycoplasma infection did not significantly differ between breeding systems. Initially, LPAI viral shedding and titer significantly differed between breeding systems post-challenge, but as the experiment progressed, there was ultimately no significant difference. (
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信