都灵瘟疫和罗马热

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
S. Kalff
{"title":"都灵瘟疫和罗马热","authors":"S. Kalff","doi":"10.25162/medhist-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on two Italian court physicians of the late sixteenth century. Although the Sabaudian court differed widely from the cardinals’ courts in Rome, both Francesco Alessandri and Marsilio Cagnati display a similar inclination to publish on subjects transcending the field of individual medicine. While Alessandri’s plague treatise is among the first to report reliably on the civic measures of plague policy, Cagnati published on climate, epidemics and astronomy. The physicians’ engagement in a variety of public functions induced them to write on broader topics with which they were professionally confronted. Their writings reflected their social and political status and their involvement in public and political matters. The publications also served to advertise for the authors’ competencies, which were not limited to medical skills. While Alessandri displayed his qualities as an official of the Torinese health board, Cagnati presented himself as a counselor who could advise not only on medicine, but on a variety of subjects.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Torinese Plague and Roman Fever\",\"authors\":\"S. Kalff\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/medhist-2018-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on two Italian court physicians of the late sixteenth century. Although the Sabaudian court differed widely from the cardinals’ courts in Rome, both Francesco Alessandri and Marsilio Cagnati display a similar inclination to publish on subjects transcending the field of individual medicine. While Alessandri’s plague treatise is among the first to report reliably on the civic measures of plague policy, Cagnati published on climate, epidemics and astronomy. The physicians’ engagement in a variety of public functions induced them to write on broader topics with which they were professionally confronted. Their writings reflected their social and political status and their involvement in public and political matters. The publications also served to advertise for the authors’ competencies, which were not limited to medical skills. While Alessandri displayed his qualities as an official of the Torinese health board, Cagnati presented himself as a counselor who could advise not only on medicine, but on a variety of subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2018-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要介绍了16世纪后期的两位意大利宫廷医生。尽管萨巴德宫廷与罗马枢机主教的宫廷有很大不同,但弗朗西斯科·亚历山德里和马西利奥·卡格纳提都表现出类似的倾向,即发表超越个人医学领域的主题。亚历山德里的鼠疫论文是最早可靠地报道鼠疫政策的公民措施的论文之一,而卡格纳提发表的是关于气候、流行病和天文学的文章。医生参与各种公共职能促使他们写更广泛的话题,他们面临的专业。他们的作品反映了他们的社会和政治地位以及他们对公共和政治事务的参与。这些出版物还有助于宣传作者的能力,这些能力不仅限于医疗技能。亚历山德里展示了他作为都灵卫生委员会官员的素质,而卡格纳提则以一名顾问的身份出现,他不仅可以在医学上提供建议,还可以在各种学科上提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Torinese Plague and Roman Fever
This article focuses on two Italian court physicians of the late sixteenth century. Although the Sabaudian court differed widely from the cardinals’ courts in Rome, both Francesco Alessandri and Marsilio Cagnati display a similar inclination to publish on subjects transcending the field of individual medicine. While Alessandri’s plague treatise is among the first to report reliably on the civic measures of plague policy, Cagnati published on climate, epidemics and astronomy. The physicians’ engagement in a variety of public functions induced them to write on broader topics with which they were professionally confronted. Their writings reflected their social and political status and their involvement in public and political matters. The publications also served to advertise for the authors’ competencies, which were not limited to medical skills. While Alessandri displayed his qualities as an official of the Torinese health board, Cagnati presented himself as a counselor who could advise not only on medicine, but on a variety of subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medizinhistorisches Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信