运用情境分析来检验声音对处于多重劣势的人的影响

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
K. Spyropoulos, C. Gidlow, F. McCormack, A. Meakin, R. Hine, Sophia E Fedorowicz
{"title":"运用情境分析来检验声音对处于多重劣势的人的影响","authors":"K. Spyropoulos, C. Gidlow, F. McCormack, A. Meakin, R. Hine, Sophia E Fedorowicz","doi":"10.1108/hcs-02-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper reports the use of situational analysis as a systems methodology to evaluate the voices of independence change and empowerment in the Stoke-on-Trent (VOICES) partnership project.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing situational analysis and drawing on a range of secondary data sources, a three-stage conceptual mapping process provided a detailed picture of both the non-linear interlinkage and complexity of the local system that VOICES was working to influence, as well as the processes that shaped the experiences of those who act within the situation.\n\n\nFindings\nData highlighted the systemic challenges facing VOICES customers (e.g. stigma and marginalisation and lack of legal literacy), progress made by VOICES in each of their priority areas and an overarching theme of VOICES promoting equity (rather than equality) to address failure demand in the system of support for people with multiple needs and disadvantage.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors present the novel application of situational analysis to demonstrate a substantial impact of VOICES while demonstrating the value of this methodology for complex systems thinking research and evaluation.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying situational analysis to examine the impact of VOICES on people experiencing multiple disadvantage\",\"authors\":\"K. Spyropoulos, C. Gidlow, F. McCormack, A. Meakin, R. Hine, Sophia E Fedorowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/hcs-02-2022-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper reports the use of situational analysis as a systems methodology to evaluate the voices of independence change and empowerment in the Stoke-on-Trent (VOICES) partnership project.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing situational analysis and drawing on a range of secondary data sources, a three-stage conceptual mapping process provided a detailed picture of both the non-linear interlinkage and complexity of the local system that VOICES was working to influence, as well as the processes that shaped the experiences of those who act within the situation.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nData highlighted the systemic challenges facing VOICES customers (e.g. stigma and marginalisation and lack of legal literacy), progress made by VOICES in each of their priority areas and an overarching theme of VOICES promoting equity (rather than equality) to address failure demand in the system of support for people with multiple needs and disadvantage.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe authors present the novel application of situational analysis to demonstrate a substantial impact of VOICES while demonstrating the value of this methodology for complex systems thinking research and evaluation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-02-2022-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-02-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文报告了使用情景分析作为系统方法来评估特伦特河畔斯托克(voices)伙伴关系项目中独立、变革和赋权的声音。设计/方法/方法采用情景分析并利用一系列二手数据来源,一个分为三个阶段的概念绘图过程详细说明了voice正在努力影响的地方系统的非线性相互联系和复杂性,以及影响在该情况下采取行动的人的经验的过程。调查结果数据强调了voice客户面临的系统性挑战(例如耻辱和边缘化以及缺乏法律知识),voice在每个优先领域取得的进展,以及voice促进公平(而不是平等)的总体主题,以解决支持有多种需求和弱势群体的系统中的失败需求。原创性/价值作者提出了情境分析的新应用,以展示voice的实质性影响,同时展示了这种方法对复杂系统思维研究和评估的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying situational analysis to examine the impact of VOICES on people experiencing multiple disadvantage
Purpose This paper reports the use of situational analysis as a systems methodology to evaluate the voices of independence change and empowerment in the Stoke-on-Trent (VOICES) partnership project. Design/methodology/approach Using situational analysis and drawing on a range of secondary data sources, a three-stage conceptual mapping process provided a detailed picture of both the non-linear interlinkage and complexity of the local system that VOICES was working to influence, as well as the processes that shaped the experiences of those who act within the situation. Findings Data highlighted the systemic challenges facing VOICES customers (e.g. stigma and marginalisation and lack of legal literacy), progress made by VOICES in each of their priority areas and an overarching theme of VOICES promoting equity (rather than equality) to address failure demand in the system of support for people with multiple needs and disadvantage. Originality/value The authors present the novel application of situational analysis to demonstrate a substantial impact of VOICES while demonstrating the value of this methodology for complex systems thinking research and evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信