对平民的好战报复合法吗?

IF 4.8 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Security Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1162/isec_c_00422

C. A. Ford, J. Harvey, F. C. Miller, Keith B. Payne, B. H. Roberts, Scott D. Sagan, Allen S. Weiner

{"title":"对平民的好战报复合法吗?","authors":"C. A. Ford, J. Harvey, F. C. Miller, Keith B. Payne, B. H. Roberts, Scott D. Sagan, Allen S. Weiner","doi":"10.1162/isec_c_00422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I enjoyed reading the thoughtful article by Scott Sagan and Allen Weiner.1 Yet, I write to point out some oaws in Sagan and Weiner’s assertion that the prohibition on civilian reprisals in the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Protocol I) applies to the United States.2 In 1987, the United States objected to the reprisal ban in Protocol I3 because it would “remove a signiacant deterrent that protects civilians and war victims on all sides of a conoict.”4 Abraham D. Sofaer, legal adviser to the U.S. Department of State, provided","PeriodicalId":48667,"journal":{"name":"International Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Belligerent Reprisals against Civilians Legal?\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Ford, J. Harvey, F. C. Miller, Keith B. Payne, B. H. Roberts, Scott D. Sagan, Allen S. Weiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/isec_c_00422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I enjoyed reading the thoughtful article by Scott Sagan and Allen Weiner.1 Yet, I write to point out some oaws in Sagan and Weiner’s assertion that the prohibition on civilian reprisals in the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Protocol I) applies to the United States.2 In 1987, the United States objected to the reprisal ban in Protocol I3 because it would “remove a signiacant deterrent that protects civilians and war victims on all sides of a conoict.”4 Abraham D. Sofaer, legal adviser to the U.S. Department of State, provided\",\"PeriodicalId\":48667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_c_00422\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_c_00422","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

我喜欢阅读Scott萨根的深思熟虑的文章和艾伦Weiner.1然而,我写指出一些oaw萨根和维纳在断言禁止平民1977附加议定书报复我1949年日内瓦公约(我)协议适用于美国States.2早在1987年,美国反对在协议I3报复禁令,因为它将“删除signiacant威慑保护平民和战争受害者conoict的各方。美国国务院法律顾问亚伯拉罕·d·索费尔(Abraham D. Sofaer)表示

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Are Belligerent Reprisals against Civilians Legal?

I enjoyed reading the thoughtful article by Scott Sagan and Allen Weiner.1 Yet, I write to point out some oaws in Sagan and Weiner’s assertion that the prohibition on civilian reprisals in the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Protocol I) applies to the United States.2 In 1987, the United States objected to the reprisal ban in Protocol I3 because it would “remove a signiacant deterrent that protects civilians and war victims on all sides of a conoict.”4 Abraham D. Sofaer, legal adviser to the U.S. Department of State, provided

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Security Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Security publishes lucid, well-documented essays on the full range of contemporary security issues. Its articles address traditional topics of war and peace, as well as more recent dimensions of security, including environmental, demographic, and humanitarian issues, transnational networks, and emerging technologies. International Security has defined the debate on US national security policy and set the agenda for scholarship on international security affairs for more than forty years. The journal values scholarship that challenges the conventional wisdom, examines policy, engages theory, illuminates history, and discovers new trends. Readers of IS discover new developments in: The causes and prevention of war U.S.-China relations Great power politics Ethnic conflict and intra-state war Terrorism and insurgency Regional security in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America U.S. foreign and defense policy International relations theory Diplomatic and military history Cybersecurity and defense technology Political economy, business, and security Nuclear proliferation.