社交焦虑中的面部情绪识别:动态信息的影响。

Q3 Psychology
Nelson Torro-Alves, I. Bezerra, R. G. E. Claudino, Marcelli Roberto Rodrigues, J. P. MACHADO-DE-SOUSA, F. Osório, J. Crippa
{"title":"社交焦虑中的面部情绪识别:动态信息的影响。","authors":"Nelson Torro-Alves, I. Bezerra, R. G. E. Claudino, Marcelli Roberto Rodrigues, J. P. MACHADO-DE-SOUSA, F. Osório, J. Crippa","doi":"10.1037/PNE0000042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies indicate that people with social anxiety show changes in perception of facial emotion. Here we investigated the recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions in 2 groups varying with regard to scores on the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) and classified as having high social anxiety (HSA; SPIN 19; n 22) and low social anxiety (SPIN 19; n 21). Facial expressions of happiness, sadness, fear, and anger in dynamic (videos) and static (photos) conditions were presented at 4 intensities (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). For each condition, recognition means were analyzed with an ANOVA of model: 2 groups (2 conditions [static and dynamic] 4 emotions 4 intensities). We found an interaction between the factors Group, Condition, Emotion, and Intensity. Post hoc analysis indicated that the HSA group had better scores in the static face of anger with 25% of emotion compared with controls. No difference between groups was found in the dynamic condition. The analysis of the confusion matrix of judgments indicated that the advantage of the participants with social anxiety in the static condition was not explained by a general bias of attributing anger to facial expressions. The results suggest an advantage for individuals with social anxiety to recognize emotions in stimuli with less ecological validity (static faces). The use of dynamic faces may reduce or eliminate the differences between individuals with high and low social anxiety in the recognition of facial emotions.","PeriodicalId":39094,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Neuroscience","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facial emotion recognition in social anxiety: The influence of dynamic information.\",\"authors\":\"Nelson Torro-Alves, I. Bezerra, R. G. E. Claudino, Marcelli Roberto Rodrigues, J. P. MACHADO-DE-SOUSA, F. Osório, J. Crippa\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/PNE0000042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies indicate that people with social anxiety show changes in perception of facial emotion. Here we investigated the recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions in 2 groups varying with regard to scores on the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) and classified as having high social anxiety (HSA; SPIN 19; n 22) and low social anxiety (SPIN 19; n 21). Facial expressions of happiness, sadness, fear, and anger in dynamic (videos) and static (photos) conditions were presented at 4 intensities (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). For each condition, recognition means were analyzed with an ANOVA of model: 2 groups (2 conditions [static and dynamic] 4 emotions 4 intensities). We found an interaction between the factors Group, Condition, Emotion, and Intensity. Post hoc analysis indicated that the HSA group had better scores in the static face of anger with 25% of emotion compared with controls. No difference between groups was found in the dynamic condition. The analysis of the confusion matrix of judgments indicated that the advantage of the participants with social anxiety in the static condition was not explained by a general bias of attributing anger to facial expressions. The results suggest an advantage for individuals with social anxiety to recognize emotions in stimuli with less ecological validity (static faces). The use of dynamic faces may reduce or eliminate the differences between individuals with high and low social anxiety in the recognition of facial emotions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/PNE0000042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/PNE0000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

研究表明,患有社交焦虑症的人对面部情绪的感知会发生变化。在这里,我们调查了两组在社交恐惧症量表(SPIN)上得分不同的静态和动态面部表情的识别,并将其归类为高度社交焦虑(HSA);自旋19;n 22)和低社交焦虑(SPIN 19;n 21)。动态(视频)和静态(照片)条件下的快乐、悲伤、恐惧和愤怒的面部表情以四种强度(25%、50%、75%和100%)呈现。对于每种情况,采用模型方差分析分析识别手段:2组(2种情况[静态和动态]4种情绪4种强度)。我们发现了群体、条件、情绪和强度这四个因素之间的相互作用。事后分析表明,与对照组相比,HSA组在静态面对愤怒时的得分更高,情绪为25%。动态条件下各组间无明显差异。对判断混淆矩阵的分析表明,社交焦虑参与者在静态条件下的优势不能用将愤怒归因于面部表情的普遍偏见来解释。结果表明,社交焦虑个体在识别生态效度较低的刺激(静态面孔)中的情绪方面具有优势。动态面孔的使用可以减少或消除高、低社交焦虑个体在面部情绪识别上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facial emotion recognition in social anxiety: The influence of dynamic information.
Studies indicate that people with social anxiety show changes in perception of facial emotion. Here we investigated the recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions in 2 groups varying with regard to scores on the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) and classified as having high social anxiety (HSA; SPIN 19; n 22) and low social anxiety (SPIN 19; n 21). Facial expressions of happiness, sadness, fear, and anger in dynamic (videos) and static (photos) conditions were presented at 4 intensities (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). For each condition, recognition means were analyzed with an ANOVA of model: 2 groups (2 conditions [static and dynamic] 4 emotions 4 intensities). We found an interaction between the factors Group, Condition, Emotion, and Intensity. Post hoc analysis indicated that the HSA group had better scores in the static face of anger with 25% of emotion compared with controls. No difference between groups was found in the dynamic condition. The analysis of the confusion matrix of judgments indicated that the advantage of the participants with social anxiety in the static condition was not explained by a general bias of attributing anger to facial expressions. The results suggest an advantage for individuals with social anxiety to recognize emotions in stimuli with less ecological validity (static faces). The use of dynamic faces may reduce or eliminate the differences between individuals with high and low social anxiety in the recognition of facial emotions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Neuroscience
Psychology and Neuroscience Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychology & Neuroscience publishes articles encompassing all intersection areas between psychology and neurosciences. The journal is organized into five thematic sections: Psychophysics and PerceptionBehavior/Systems/CognitionPlasticity and Neural DevelopmentClinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyNeuropsychopharmacology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信