如何改进分诊分类:一个评估护士决策质量的仪表板

IF 4.9 Q1 BUSINESS
L. Cannavacciuolo, C. Ponsiglione, Antonio D’Ambrosio
{"title":"如何改进分诊分类:一个评估护士决策质量的仪表板","authors":"L. Cannavacciuolo, C. Ponsiglione, Antonio D’Ambrosio","doi":"10.1177/18479790211065558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a dashboard for assessing the quality of Triage decision-making process in the assignment of the priority code to patients arriving at an emergency department. The quality is assessed through performance indexes aimed at measuring both the nurses’ accuracy and the presence of nurses’ shared behavior in the Triage assignment process. The theoretical perspective of the cognitive heuristic, that is a cognitive shortcut strategy to make decisions, is the framework to design performance indexes of the dashboard. The dashboard has been tested in two Emergency Departments. We gather the data input through the submission to 54 nurses of a questionnaire, simulating 25 patients’ scenarios. The dashboard reveals a disparity between nurses in priority level assignment. This disparity depends on nurses’ capacity in disregarding some information and in considering the right cue. We find the presence of sharing behaviors and inclination to over or under assessment by nurses. This performance analysis, integrated with the nurses’ reasoning in assigning the priority code, can address the management in designing improvement actions at individual level and at the organizational one. In addition, the application to two Emergency Department confirms the influence of organizational aspects in the individual decision process.","PeriodicalId":45882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Business Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to improve the Triage: A dashboard to assess the quality of nurses’ decision-making\",\"authors\":\"L. Cannavacciuolo, C. Ponsiglione, Antonio D’Ambrosio\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18479790211065558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a dashboard for assessing the quality of Triage decision-making process in the assignment of the priority code to patients arriving at an emergency department. The quality is assessed through performance indexes aimed at measuring both the nurses’ accuracy and the presence of nurses’ shared behavior in the Triage assignment process. The theoretical perspective of the cognitive heuristic, that is a cognitive shortcut strategy to make decisions, is the framework to design performance indexes of the dashboard. The dashboard has been tested in two Emergency Departments. We gather the data input through the submission to 54 nurses of a questionnaire, simulating 25 patients’ scenarios. The dashboard reveals a disparity between nurses in priority level assignment. This disparity depends on nurses’ capacity in disregarding some information and in considering the right cue. We find the presence of sharing behaviors and inclination to over or under assessment by nurses. This performance analysis, integrated with the nurses’ reasoning in assigning the priority code, can address the management in designing improvement actions at individual level and at the organizational one. In addition, the application to two Emergency Department confirms the influence of organizational aspects in the individual decision process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Business Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Business Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211065558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211065558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一个仪表板评估质量的分诊决策过程中分配优先级代码的病人到达急诊科。质量通过绩效指标来评估,旨在衡量护士在分诊分配过程中的准确性和护士共同行为的存在。认知启发式的理论视角是设计仪表板绩效指标的框架,它是一种做出决策的认知捷径策略。仪表盘已经在两个急诊科进行了测试。我们通过向54名护士提交一份问卷,模拟25名患者的情景,收集数据输入。仪表板显示了护士在优先级分配上的差异。这种差异取决于护士忽视某些信息和考虑正确提示的能力。我们发现护士存在分享行为和过高或过低评估的倾向。这种绩效分析与护士在分配优先级代码时的推理相结合,可以在个人层面和组织层面上解决管理人员设计改进行动的问题。此外,对两个急诊科的应用证实了组织方面在个人决策过程中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to improve the Triage: A dashboard to assess the quality of nurses’ decision-making
This paper presents a dashboard for assessing the quality of Triage decision-making process in the assignment of the priority code to patients arriving at an emergency department. The quality is assessed through performance indexes aimed at measuring both the nurses’ accuracy and the presence of nurses’ shared behavior in the Triage assignment process. The theoretical perspective of the cognitive heuristic, that is a cognitive shortcut strategy to make decisions, is the framework to design performance indexes of the dashboard. The dashboard has been tested in two Emergency Departments. We gather the data input through the submission to 54 nurses of a questionnaire, simulating 25 patients’ scenarios. The dashboard reveals a disparity between nurses in priority level assignment. This disparity depends on nurses’ capacity in disregarding some information and in considering the right cue. We find the presence of sharing behaviors and inclination to over or under assessment by nurses. This performance analysis, integrated with the nurses’ reasoning in assigning the priority code, can address the management in designing improvement actions at individual level and at the organizational one. In addition, the application to two Emergency Department confirms the influence of organizational aspects in the individual decision process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engineering Business Management (IJEBM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal that aims to promote an integrated and multidisciplinary approach to engineering, business and management. The journal focuses on issues related to the design, development and implementation of new methodologies and technologies that contribute to strategic and operational improvements of organizations within the contemporary global business environment. IJEBM encourages a systematic and holistic view in order to ensure an integrated and economically, socially and environmentally friendly approach to management of new technologies in business. It aims to be a world-class research platform for academics, managers, and professionals to publish scholarly research in the global arena. All submitted articles considered suitable for the International Journal of Engineering Business Management are subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure the highest levels of quality. The review process is carried out as quickly as possible to minimize any delays in the online publication of articles. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: -Competitive product design and innovation -Operations and manufacturing strategy -Knowledge management and knowledge innovation -Information and decision support systems -Radio Frequency Identification -Wireless Sensor Networks -Industrial engineering for business improvement -Logistics engineering and transportation -Modeling and simulation of industrial and business systems -Quality management and Six Sigma -Automation of industrial processes and systems -Manufacturing performance and productivity measurement -Supply Chain Management and the virtual enterprise network -Environmental, legal and social aspects -Technology Capital and Financial Modelling -Engineering Economics and Investment Theory -Behavioural, Social and Political factors in Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信