暴力的悖论

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Sergiy Shevtsov
{"title":"暴力的悖论","authors":"Sergiy Shevtsov","doi":"10.18524/2410-2601.2022.2(38).283063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the question of the reason for the constant violent actions, primarily military, despite their long-standing universal condemnation. This brings us back to the problem of the ontology of violence. The author proposes an approach based on the understanding of violence as labor with excessive use of force. This is due to the archaic understanding of power as a source of the sacred. Truth is an attribute of the sacred in archaic thinking. Here the connection arises: power - the sacred (deity) - truth. Thus, for the archaic mind, force (and violence), the sacred and truth were different projections-realizations of one essence. The civilizational model of the world suggests a different connection with the sacred and truth. It contains at its core not the principles of a single truth, but the principles of cooperation and coexistence of different positions instead of subordination to one unity. The old model of violence as a way of participating in the truth of the object and confirming the sacred status of the subject is still valid in the modern world. According to the author, violence has an ontological dimension in the old model of a single truth, but cannot have it within the civilizational approach. The modern civilizational model can oppose force only by persuasion or the reasonable use of force. This state of affairs makes it difficult to spread the civilizational approach.","PeriodicalId":42106,"journal":{"name":"Doxa Comunicacion","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PARADOX OF VIOLENCE\",\"authors\":\"Sergiy Shevtsov\",\"doi\":\"10.18524/2410-2601.2022.2(38).283063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article raises the question of the reason for the constant violent actions, primarily military, despite their long-standing universal condemnation. This brings us back to the problem of the ontology of violence. The author proposes an approach based on the understanding of violence as labor with excessive use of force. This is due to the archaic understanding of power as a source of the sacred. Truth is an attribute of the sacred in archaic thinking. Here the connection arises: power - the sacred (deity) - truth. Thus, for the archaic mind, force (and violence), the sacred and truth were different projections-realizations of one essence. The civilizational model of the world suggests a different connection with the sacred and truth. It contains at its core not the principles of a single truth, but the principles of cooperation and coexistence of different positions instead of subordination to one unity. The old model of violence as a way of participating in the truth of the object and confirming the sacred status of the subject is still valid in the modern world. According to the author, violence has an ontological dimension in the old model of a single truth, but cannot have it within the civilizational approach. The modern civilizational model can oppose force only by persuasion or the reasonable use of force. This state of affairs makes it difficult to spread the civilizational approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Doxa Comunicacion\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Doxa Comunicacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2022.2(38).283063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Doxa Comunicacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2022.2(38).283063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条提出了一个问题,即暴力行动,主要是军事行动,尽管长期受到普遍谴责,但为何不断发生。这把我们带回到暴力本体论的问题上。作者提出了一种基于将暴力理解为过度使用武力的劳动的方法。这是由于对权力的古老理解是神圣的源泉。在古代思想中,真理是神圣的属性。这里的联系出现了:权力-神圣(神)-真理。因此,对于古代的思想,力量(和暴力),神圣和真理是一个本质的不同的投影和实现。世界的文明模式表明了与神圣和真理的不同联系。它的核心不是单一真理的原则,而是不同立场的合作与共存原则,而不是服从于一个统一的原则。暴力作为一种参与客体真理和确认主体神圣地位的方式的旧模式在现代世界仍然有效。作者认为,暴力在单一真理的旧模型中具有本体论的维度,但在文明方法中却不具有它。现代文明模式只能通过说服或合理使用武力来反对武力。这种状况使得文明的方法难以传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PARADOX OF VIOLENCE
The article raises the question of the reason for the constant violent actions, primarily military, despite their long-standing universal condemnation. This brings us back to the problem of the ontology of violence. The author proposes an approach based on the understanding of violence as labor with excessive use of force. This is due to the archaic understanding of power as a source of the sacred. Truth is an attribute of the sacred in archaic thinking. Here the connection arises: power - the sacred (deity) - truth. Thus, for the archaic mind, force (and violence), the sacred and truth were different projections-realizations of one essence. The civilizational model of the world suggests a different connection with the sacred and truth. It contains at its core not the principles of a single truth, but the principles of cooperation and coexistence of different positions instead of subordination to one unity. The old model of violence as a way of participating in the truth of the object and confirming the sacred status of the subject is still valid in the modern world. According to the author, violence has an ontological dimension in the old model of a single truth, but cannot have it within the civilizational approach. The modern civilizational model can oppose force only by persuasion or the reasonable use of force. This state of affairs makes it difficult to spread the civilizational approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Doxa Comunicacion
Doxa Comunicacion COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信