草甘膦在不同干燥时间燕麦干燥收获中的应用

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
E. H. Horst, M. Neumann, Murilo Klosovski Carneiro, C. Czelusniak, A. V. I. Bueno, B. Venancio, Marianne Seller, P. Cesar
{"title":"草甘膦在不同干燥时间燕麦干燥收获中的应用","authors":"E. H. Horst, M. Neumann, Murilo Klosovski Carneiro, C. Czelusniak, A. V. I. Bueno, B. Venancio, Marianne Seller, P. Cesar","doi":"10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to evaluate the ruminal disappearance rate of dry matter and NDF of black oat haylage subjected to mechanical and chemical dehydration and six wilting periods in the field, as follows: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 days. Forage haylages were ensiled and stored in PVC mini-silos for 60 days until opening for in situ evaluations. The pre-set ruminal incubation times were: 0, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours. Regardless of the dehydration time, forage subjected to mechanical dehydration showed ruminal disappearance rates of dry matter and NDF, thus DISDM-48h and DISNDF-48h were superior for this method compared to the chemical method. There was a reduction in DISDM-48h and DISNDF-48h with advancing time of wilting in the field for haylage dehydrated by the chemical method. In general, the chemical dehydration method seems to be more related to better haylage making practices than nutritional factors, where the haylage obtained by mechanical dehydration is superior.","PeriodicalId":7149,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glyphosate in oat desiccation for haylage harvest at different wilting times\",\"authors\":\"E. H. Horst, M. Neumann, Murilo Klosovski Carneiro, C. Czelusniak, A. V. I. Bueno, B. Venancio, Marianne Seller, P. Cesar\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective was to evaluate the ruminal disappearance rate of dry matter and NDF of black oat haylage subjected to mechanical and chemical dehydration and six wilting periods in the field, as follows: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 days. Forage haylages were ensiled and stored in PVC mini-silos for 60 days until opening for in situ evaluations. The pre-set ruminal incubation times were: 0, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours. Regardless of the dehydration time, forage subjected to mechanical dehydration showed ruminal disappearance rates of dry matter and NDF, thus DISDM-48h and DISNDF-48h were superior for this method compared to the chemical method. There was a reduction in DISDM-48h and DISNDF-48h with advancing time of wilting in the field for haylage dehydrated by the chemical method. In general, the chemical dehydration method seems to be more related to better haylage making practices than nutritional factors, where the haylage obtained by mechanical dehydration is superior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在评价黑燕麦在田间经过机械和化学脱水和6个萎蔫期(0、3、6、9、12和15 d)后干物质和NDF的瘤胃消失率。饲草干草青贮在聚氯乙烯微型筒仓中保存60天,直到打开进行现场评价。预先设定的瘤胃孵育时间分别为:0、6、12、24、36和48小时。不管脱水时间,饲料机械脱水显示瘤胃干物质和NDF消失,因此DISDM-48h和DISNDF-48h优越的化学方法相比这种方法。田间化学脱水干草的不屑于m -48h和DISNDF-48h随萎蔫时间的延长而降低。总的来说,化学脱水法似乎与更好的干草制作实践比营养因素更相关,其中机械脱水获得的干草更优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glyphosate in oat desiccation for haylage harvest at different wilting times
The objective was to evaluate the ruminal disappearance rate of dry matter and NDF of black oat haylage subjected to mechanical and chemical dehydration and six wilting periods in the field, as follows: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 days. Forage haylages were ensiled and stored in PVC mini-silos for 60 days until opening for in situ evaluations. The pre-set ruminal incubation times were: 0, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours. Regardless of the dehydration time, forage subjected to mechanical dehydration showed ruminal disappearance rates of dry matter and NDF, thus DISDM-48h and DISNDF-48h were superior for this method compared to the chemical method. There was a reduction in DISDM-48h and DISNDF-48h with advancing time of wilting in the field for haylage dehydrated by the chemical method. In general, the chemical dehydration method seems to be more related to better haylage making practices than nutritional factors, where the haylage obtained by mechanical dehydration is superior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信