K. Hughes, J. Oduol, Hilda J. S. Kegode, J. Kimaiyo, K. Mausch
{"title":"来自乌干达奶农饲料灌木推广工作的实验证据","authors":"K. Hughes, J. Oduol, Hilda J. S. Kegode, J. Kimaiyo, K. Mausch","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2022.2099952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous research has demonstrated the potential of fodder tree technology (FTT) in bolstering milk yields and quality among small-scale dairy producers. Yet, FTT adoption at recommended levels is low. To suport producers overcome the adoption hurdle,, we conducted a randomised field experiment in Eastern Uganda to compare an innovative add-on intervention designed to address several behavioural-related FTT adoption barriers against a base training and seedling access intervention and a control. We observe a 19% greater increase in new FTT uptake among producers in our two intervention groups. However, we find that our add-on intervention failed to induce a differential effect.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evidence from a fodder shrub promotional effort among dairy farmers in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"K. Hughes, J. Oduol, Hilda J. S. Kegode, J. Kimaiyo, K. Mausch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439342.2022.2099952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Previous research has demonstrated the potential of fodder tree technology (FTT) in bolstering milk yields and quality among small-scale dairy producers. Yet, FTT adoption at recommended levels is low. To suport producers overcome the adoption hurdle,, we conducted a randomised field experiment in Eastern Uganda to compare an innovative add-on intervention designed to address several behavioural-related FTT adoption barriers against a base training and seedling access intervention and a control. We observe a 19% greater increase in new FTT uptake among producers in our two intervention groups. However, we find that our add-on intervention failed to induce a differential effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2022.2099952\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2022.2099952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental evidence from a fodder shrub promotional effort among dairy farmers in Uganda
ABSTRACT Previous research has demonstrated the potential of fodder tree technology (FTT) in bolstering milk yields and quality among small-scale dairy producers. Yet, FTT adoption at recommended levels is low. To suport producers overcome the adoption hurdle,, we conducted a randomised field experiment in Eastern Uganda to compare an innovative add-on intervention designed to address several behavioural-related FTT adoption barriers against a base training and seedling access intervention and a control. We observe a 19% greater increase in new FTT uptake among producers in our two intervention groups. However, we find that our add-on intervention failed to induce a differential effect.