两种排放方案模拟东亚矿物粉尘气溶胶的比较

Jian Wu , Yanyan Xu , Congbin Fu , Renjian Zhang , Min Dai , Yong Zhu
{"title":"两种排放方案模拟东亚矿物粉尘气溶胶的比较","authors":"Jian Wu ,&nbsp;Yanyan Xu ,&nbsp;Congbin Fu ,&nbsp;Renjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Dai ,&nbsp;Yong Zhu","doi":"10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60278-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two common surface-dust emission schemes using critical wind speed and friction velocity were compared with the regional climate model RegCM3 in East Asia. In the comparison, transport of mineral dust and its distribution were simulated from March to April, 2001. Simulation results were also compared with TOMS aerosol index, showing that obvious differences exist in dust emission quantity and its column burden simulated by the dust emission schemes of friction velocity and wind speed criteria. The results obtained by the wind speed criterion are higher than that by friction velocity, bringing forth the problem whether or not the dust emission scheme matches the model. The obvious difference in the two schemes also explains the uncertainty of simulating mineral dust aerosol by modeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100239,"journal":{"name":"China Particuology","volume":"4 6","pages":"Pages 293-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60278-4","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of simulating mineral dust aerosols in east asia by two emission schemes\",\"authors\":\"Jian Wu ,&nbsp;Yanyan Xu ,&nbsp;Congbin Fu ,&nbsp;Renjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Dai ,&nbsp;Yong Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60278-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two common surface-dust emission schemes using critical wind speed and friction velocity were compared with the regional climate model RegCM3 in East Asia. In the comparison, transport of mineral dust and its distribution were simulated from March to April, 2001. Simulation results were also compared with TOMS aerosol index, showing that obvious differences exist in dust emission quantity and its column burden simulated by the dust emission schemes of friction velocity and wind speed criteria. The results obtained by the wind speed criterion are higher than that by friction velocity, bringing forth the problem whether or not the dust emission scheme matches the model. The obvious difference in the two schemes also explains the uncertainty of simulating mineral dust aerosol by modeling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Particuology\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 293-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60278-4\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Particuology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672251507602784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Particuology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672251507602784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

利用临界风速和摩擦速度与东亚区域气候模式RegCM3进行了比较。在此基础上,模拟了2001年3 ~ 4月的矿物粉尘输运及其分布。模拟结果还与TOMS气溶胶指数进行了比较,结果表明,摩擦速度标准和风速标准两种降尘方案模拟的降尘量和降尘柱负荷存在明显差异。风速判据得到的结果比摩擦速度判据得到的结果要高,这就提出了降尘方案与模型是否匹配的问题。两种方案的明显差异也解释了模拟矿物粉尘气溶胶的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of simulating mineral dust aerosols in east asia by two emission schemes

Two common surface-dust emission schemes using critical wind speed and friction velocity were compared with the regional climate model RegCM3 in East Asia. In the comparison, transport of mineral dust and its distribution were simulated from March to April, 2001. Simulation results were also compared with TOMS aerosol index, showing that obvious differences exist in dust emission quantity and its column burden simulated by the dust emission schemes of friction velocity and wind speed criteria. The results obtained by the wind speed criterion are higher than that by friction velocity, bringing forth the problem whether or not the dust emission scheme matches the model. The obvious difference in the two schemes also explains the uncertainty of simulating mineral dust aerosol by modeling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信