美国大兵和“吉普女郎”:战时中国的性与美国士兵

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY
Zach Fredman
{"title":"美国大兵和“吉普女郎”:战时中国的性与美国士兵","authors":"Zach Fredman","doi":"10.1080/17535654.2019.1618627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines how sex affected the larger politics of the Sino–US alliance during World War II. By early 1945, Chinese from across the social spectrum resented the US military presence, but just one issue sparked a violent backlash: sexual relations between American soldiers (GIs) and Chinese women. Two interrelated, patriarchal narratives about sex emerged that spring. Starting in March, government-backed newspapers began criticizing “Jeep girls,” an epithet coined to describe the Chinese women who consorted with American servicemen. Rumors also circulated that GIs were using Jeeps to kidnap “respectable” women and rape them. Each narrative portrayed women’s bodies as territory to be recovered and inextricable from national sovereignty. These narratives resonated widely, turning Jeep girls into the catalyst through which all variables causing resentment against the US military presence intersected and converged. With Japan on the ropes, China’s allied friends now stood in the way of irreversibly consigning foreign imperialism to the past. Sexual relations were not the Sino–US alliance’s seedy underside, but the core site of its tensions.","PeriodicalId":41223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Chinese History","volume":"174 1","pages":"101 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GIs and “Jeep girls”: sex and American soldiers in wartime China\",\"authors\":\"Zach Fredman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17535654.2019.1618627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines how sex affected the larger politics of the Sino–US alliance during World War II. By early 1945, Chinese from across the social spectrum resented the US military presence, but just one issue sparked a violent backlash: sexual relations between American soldiers (GIs) and Chinese women. Two interrelated, patriarchal narratives about sex emerged that spring. Starting in March, government-backed newspapers began criticizing “Jeep girls,” an epithet coined to describe the Chinese women who consorted with American servicemen. Rumors also circulated that GIs were using Jeeps to kidnap “respectable” women and rape them. Each narrative portrayed women’s bodies as territory to be recovered and inextricable from national sovereignty. These narratives resonated widely, turning Jeep girls into the catalyst through which all variables causing resentment against the US military presence intersected and converged. With Japan on the ropes, China’s allied friends now stood in the way of irreversibly consigning foreign imperialism to the past. Sexual relations were not the Sino–US alliance’s seedy underside, but the core site of its tensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Chinese History\",\"volume\":\"174 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Chinese History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535654.2019.1618627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Chinese History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535654.2019.1618627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨了二战期间性别对中美同盟的宏观政治影响。到1945年初,中国社会各阶层都对美军的存在感到不满,但只有一件事引发了强烈的反弹:美国士兵与中国妇女的性关系。那年春天出现了两种相互关联的男权性叙事。从3月开始,政府支持的报纸开始批评“吉普女郎”,这是一个用来形容与美国军人厮混的中国女性的绰号。还有传言说,美国大兵用吉普车绑架“体面的”妇女并强奸她们。每一种叙事都将女性的身体描绘成有待收复的领土,与国家主权密不可分。这些故事引起了广泛的共鸣,把吉普女孩变成了催化剂,通过这种催化剂,所有导致对美国军事存在的怨恨的变量都交叉并融合在一起。随着日本陷入困境,中国的盟友们现在站在阻碍外国帝国主义成为历史的路上,这是不可逆转的。性关系不是中美同盟肮脏的阴暗面,而是关系紧张的核心所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GIs and “Jeep girls”: sex and American soldiers in wartime China
ABSTRACT This article examines how sex affected the larger politics of the Sino–US alliance during World War II. By early 1945, Chinese from across the social spectrum resented the US military presence, but just one issue sparked a violent backlash: sexual relations between American soldiers (GIs) and Chinese women. Two interrelated, patriarchal narratives about sex emerged that spring. Starting in March, government-backed newspapers began criticizing “Jeep girls,” an epithet coined to describe the Chinese women who consorted with American servicemen. Rumors also circulated that GIs were using Jeeps to kidnap “respectable” women and rape them. Each narrative portrayed women’s bodies as territory to be recovered and inextricable from national sovereignty. These narratives resonated widely, turning Jeep girls into the catalyst through which all variables causing resentment against the US military presence intersected and converged. With Japan on the ropes, China’s allied friends now stood in the way of irreversibly consigning foreign imperialism to the past. Sexual relations were not the Sino–US alliance’s seedy underside, but the core site of its tensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
460
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信