激光荧光作为数字放射照相的替代方法用于检测龋齿病变

Lucila Massu Yoshizaki Akinaga Moreira, Bruna Cordeiro Amarante, B. Marotta, C. Iida, D. Nishimura, Suelen Schumiski, C. Costa
{"title":"激光荧光作为数字放射照相的替代方法用于检测龋齿病变","authors":"Lucila Massu Yoshizaki Akinaga Moreira, Bruna Cordeiro Amarante, B. Marotta, C. Iida, D. Nishimura, Suelen Schumiski, C. Costa","doi":"10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2020.169239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diagnosis of caries lesions consists of visual/tactile methods following the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and radiographic methods (BW), however these methods have limitations for detecting caries at different depths and locations and is usually influenced by the examiner’s experience. New technologies have emerged to improve caries diagnosis methods, among these are methods that use optical principles to quantify differences between healthy and demineralized tissues, for example: quantitative light- -induced fluorescence (QLF), the “DIAGNOdent” caries detection pen, and VistaProof (fluorescence camera). This literature review aims to provide up-to-date information on the applicability of fluorescence-based methods in the diagnosis of caries. The results show that DIAGNOdent pen was the most effective method for diagnosing caries, wherein some authors indicate that it can be used as the only diagnostic method, but most recommend using it as a complementary method to ICDAS and BW. LFpen must be used in association with ICDAS and 2 articles indicate near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) as a substitute for BW, however there is still a need for further studies to reach a concrete decision. In conclusion, digital methods for the diagnosis of caries are efficient, but they do not replace visual/tactile methods and bitewing radiographs. Therefore, they should be used as a complementary diagnostic method to those already known and widely used and studied.","PeriodicalId":10204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laser fluorescence as an alternative for digital radiography in detecting caries lesions\",\"authors\":\"Lucila Massu Yoshizaki Akinaga Moreira, Bruna Cordeiro Amarante, B. Marotta, C. Iida, D. Nishimura, Suelen Schumiski, C. Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2020.169239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diagnosis of caries lesions consists of visual/tactile methods following the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and radiographic methods (BW), however these methods have limitations for detecting caries at different depths and locations and is usually influenced by the examiner’s experience. New technologies have emerged to improve caries diagnosis methods, among these are methods that use optical principles to quantify differences between healthy and demineralized tissues, for example: quantitative light- -induced fluorescence (QLF), the “DIAGNOdent” caries detection pen, and VistaProof (fluorescence camera). This literature review aims to provide up-to-date information on the applicability of fluorescence-based methods in the diagnosis of caries. The results show that DIAGNOdent pen was the most effective method for diagnosing caries, wherein some authors indicate that it can be used as the only diagnostic method, but most recommend using it as a complementary method to ICDAS and BW. LFpen must be used in association with ICDAS and 2 articles indicate near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) as a substitute for BW, however there is still a need for further studies to reach a concrete decision. In conclusion, digital methods for the diagnosis of caries are efficient, but they do not replace visual/tactile methods and bitewing radiographs. Therefore, they should be used as a complementary diagnostic method to those already known and widely used and studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2020.169239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Laboratorial Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2357-8041.clrd.2020.169239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

根据国际龋齿检测和评估系统(ICDAS)和放射学方法(BW),龋齿病变的诊断包括视觉/触觉方法,但是这些方法在检测不同深度和位置的龋齿方面存在局限性,并且通常受检查人员经验的影响。新技术的出现改善了龋齿的诊断方法,其中包括利用光学原理来量化健康组织和脱矿组织之间的差异的方法,例如:定量光诱导荧光(QLF),“DIAGNOdent”龋齿检测笔和VistaProof(荧光相机)。这篇文献综述的目的是提供最新的信息,荧光为基础的方法在诊断龋齿的适用性。结果表明,诊断笔是诊断龋病最有效的方法,部分作者认为可以作为唯一的诊断方法,但大多数作者建议将其作为ICDAS和BW的补充方法。LFpen必须与ICDAS联合使用,有2篇文章指出近红外光透照(NILT)可以替代BW,但仍需要进一步研究才能做出具体决定。综上所述,数字方法诊断龋齿是有效的,但不能取代视觉/触觉方法和咬牙x线片。因此,它们应该作为已知的、广泛使用和研究的诊断方法的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laser fluorescence as an alternative for digital radiography in detecting caries lesions
Diagnosis of caries lesions consists of visual/tactile methods following the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and radiographic methods (BW), however these methods have limitations for detecting caries at different depths and locations and is usually influenced by the examiner’s experience. New technologies have emerged to improve caries diagnosis methods, among these are methods that use optical principles to quantify differences between healthy and demineralized tissues, for example: quantitative light- -induced fluorescence (QLF), the “DIAGNOdent” caries detection pen, and VistaProof (fluorescence camera). This literature review aims to provide up-to-date information on the applicability of fluorescence-based methods in the diagnosis of caries. The results show that DIAGNOdent pen was the most effective method for diagnosing caries, wherein some authors indicate that it can be used as the only diagnostic method, but most recommend using it as a complementary method to ICDAS and BW. LFpen must be used in association with ICDAS and 2 articles indicate near-infrared light transillumination (NILT) as a substitute for BW, however there is still a need for further studies to reach a concrete decision. In conclusion, digital methods for the diagnosis of caries are efficient, but they do not replace visual/tactile methods and bitewing radiographs. Therefore, they should be used as a complementary diagnostic method to those already known and widely used and studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信