自愿管辖权和相互冲突的利益:任命信托监护人的情况

C. Pasini
{"title":"自愿管辖权和相互冲突的利益:任命信托监护人的情况","authors":"C. Pasini","doi":"10.35948/1590-5586/2022.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tesi\nIl Tribunale ha ritenuto inammissibile un ricorso per la nomina del guardiano previsto nell’atto istitutivo del trust proposto da (alcuni dei) beneficiari di un trust, poiché intrapreso con le forme della volontaria giurisdizione invece che con quelle proprie del giudizio contenzioso. L’autore osserva che la giurisdizione volontaria ammette l’esistenza di soggetti controinteressati e che le forme contenziose mal si adattano a procedimenti per la nomina di soggetti del trust.\nThe author’s view\nThe Court found inadmissible an appeal for the appointment of the protector brought by some of the beneficiaries of a trust, pursuant to the trust deed, on the ground that the appellants initiated a non-contentious procedure instead of a contentious one.\nThe author observes, on the one hand, that counter-interested parties are admitted in non-contentious procedures and, on the other hand, that contentious procedures are ill-suited to proceedings for the appointment of trustees, enforcers, and protectors of a trust.","PeriodicalId":83376,"journal":{"name":"Trusts and estates","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volontaria giurisdizione e interessi in conflitto: il caso della nomina del guardiano di un trust\",\"authors\":\"C. Pasini\",\"doi\":\"10.35948/1590-5586/2022.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tesi\\nIl Tribunale ha ritenuto inammissibile un ricorso per la nomina del guardiano previsto nell’atto istitutivo del trust proposto da (alcuni dei) beneficiari di un trust, poiché intrapreso con le forme della volontaria giurisdizione invece che con quelle proprie del giudizio contenzioso. L’autore osserva che la giurisdizione volontaria ammette l’esistenza di soggetti controinteressati e che le forme contenziose mal si adattano a procedimenti per la nomina di soggetti del trust.\\nThe author’s view\\nThe Court found inadmissible an appeal for the appointment of the protector brought by some of the beneficiaries of a trust, pursuant to the trust deed, on the ground that the appellants initiated a non-contentious procedure instead of a contentious one.\\nThe author observes, on the one hand, that counter-interested parties are admitted in non-contentious procedures and, on the other hand, that contentious procedures are ill-suited to proceedings for the appointment of trustees, enforcers, and protectors of a trust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts and estates\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts and estates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35948/1590-5586/2022.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts and estates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35948/1590-5586/2022.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《法庭》规定,根据受托人的名义和受托人对受托人的建议,按照受托人对受托人的建议,按照受托人对受托人的建议,按照受托人对受托人的建议,按照受托人对受托人的建议,按照受托人对受托人的规定,按照受托人对受托人的规定,按照受托人对受托人的规定,按照受托人对受托人的规定,按照受托人对受托人的规定。《法律监督条例》第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:“法律监督条例”第1条规定:提交人的观点法院认为,根据信托契约,信托的一些受益人提出的任命保护人的上诉不予受理,理由是上诉人提起的是无争议程序,而不是有争议程序。作者认为,一方面,反利害关系方在无争议程序中是允许的,另一方面,有争议程序不适用于任命受托人、执行人和信托保护人的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volontaria giurisdizione e interessi in conflitto: il caso della nomina del guardiano di un trust
Tesi Il Tribunale ha ritenuto inammissibile un ricorso per la nomina del guardiano previsto nell’atto istitutivo del trust proposto da (alcuni dei) beneficiari di un trust, poiché intrapreso con le forme della volontaria giurisdizione invece che con quelle proprie del giudizio contenzioso. L’autore osserva che la giurisdizione volontaria ammette l’esistenza di soggetti controinteressati e che le forme contenziose mal si adattano a procedimenti per la nomina di soggetti del trust. The author’s view The Court found inadmissible an appeal for the appointment of the protector brought by some of the beneficiaries of a trust, pursuant to the trust deed, on the ground that the appellants initiated a non-contentious procedure instead of a contentious one. The author observes, on the one hand, that counter-interested parties are admitted in non-contentious procedures and, on the other hand, that contentious procedures are ill-suited to proceedings for the appointment of trustees, enforcers, and protectors of a trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信