刺槐和刺槐的抗氧化活性、酚类和类黄酮含量

IF 0.3 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Alireza Moulazadeh, Seyyed Amin Kouhpayeh, R. Ranjbar, A. Dakhili Ardestani, Maryam Hekmat, Sara Azarnia, S. Najafipour
{"title":"刺槐和刺槐的抗氧化活性、酚类和类黄酮含量","authors":"Alireza Moulazadeh, Seyyed Amin Kouhpayeh, R. Ranjbar, A. Dakhili Ardestani, Maryam Hekmat, Sara Azarnia, S. Najafipour","doi":"10.52547/ppj.25.3.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Continuous exposure of oxidants to the skin may disrupt the antioxidant balance and leads to inflammatory skin diseases (ISD). The aim of the present study was to compare the antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content of two traditionally used plants in ISD, Lawsonia inermis and Haplophyllum vermiculare. Methods: The hydroethanolic extract of the plants was prepared by maceration. Phenolic and flavonoid content of the extracts was measured respectively with Folin-Ciocateu and aluminum chloride methods. The monovalent reducing power and radical scavenging activity were also evaluated respectively by ferric reducing antioxidant power and 2,2-diphenyl-1picryl-hydrazyl methods. Results: The reducing power of Lawsonia inermis (862.89±32.23 μmolFe2+/g) was significantly higher than Haplophyllum vermiculare extract (765.52±29.39 μmolFe2+/g). The radical scavenging activity of Lawsonia inermis extract at a concentration of 1000μg/ml (%65.72±0.77) was also significantly higher than Haplophyllum vermiculare (%36.34±2.52). The higher antioxidant activity of Lawsonia inermis is probably due to its higher phenolic (96.76±3.34μg GAE/mg) and flavonoid content (197.69±5.76μg QE/mg). Conclusion: Henna leaves had higher antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content compared to aerial parts of Haplophyllum vermiculare, and may be more effective in improving oxidative stress, prevention and treatment of ISD.","PeriodicalId":20151,"journal":{"name":"Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content of Lawsonia inermis and Haplophyllum vermiculare\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Moulazadeh, Seyyed Amin Kouhpayeh, R. Ranjbar, A. Dakhili Ardestani, Maryam Hekmat, Sara Azarnia, S. Najafipour\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/ppj.25.3.261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Continuous exposure of oxidants to the skin may disrupt the antioxidant balance and leads to inflammatory skin diseases (ISD). The aim of the present study was to compare the antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content of two traditionally used plants in ISD, Lawsonia inermis and Haplophyllum vermiculare. Methods: The hydroethanolic extract of the plants was prepared by maceration. Phenolic and flavonoid content of the extracts was measured respectively with Folin-Ciocateu and aluminum chloride methods. The monovalent reducing power and radical scavenging activity were also evaluated respectively by ferric reducing antioxidant power and 2,2-diphenyl-1picryl-hydrazyl methods. Results: The reducing power of Lawsonia inermis (862.89±32.23 μmolFe2+/g) was significantly higher than Haplophyllum vermiculare extract (765.52±29.39 μmolFe2+/g). The radical scavenging activity of Lawsonia inermis extract at a concentration of 1000μg/ml (%65.72±0.77) was also significantly higher than Haplophyllum vermiculare (%36.34±2.52). The higher antioxidant activity of Lawsonia inermis is probably due to its higher phenolic (96.76±3.34μg GAE/mg) and flavonoid content (197.69±5.76μg QE/mg). Conclusion: Henna leaves had higher antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content compared to aerial parts of Haplophyllum vermiculare, and may be more effective in improving oxidative stress, prevention and treatment of ISD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/ppj.25.3.261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ppj.25.3.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:持续暴露于氧化剂的皮肤可能会破坏抗氧化平衡,导致炎症性皮肤病(ISD)。本研究的目的是比较两种ISD中常用的植物Lawsonia inermis和Haplophyllum vermiculare的抗氧化活性、酚类和类黄酮含量。方法:采用浸渍法制备水乙醇提取物。分别用福林- ciocateu法和氯化铝法测定提取物中的酚类和类黄酮含量。采用铁还原抗氧化能力法和2,2-二苯基-1苦味基-肼基法分别对其单价还原能力和自由基清除能力进行了评价。结果:刺槐提取物的还原力(862.89±32.23 μmolFe2+/g)显著高于蛭形单叶菌提取物(765.52±29.39 μmolFe2+/g)。在浓度为1000μg/ml时,刺槐提取物的自由基清除活性(%65.72±0.77)也显著高于蛭状单叶菌(%36.34±2.52)。刺槐具有较高的抗氧化活性,可能是由于其酚类含量(96.76±3.34μg QE/mg)和类黄酮含量(197.69±5.76μg QE/mg)较高。结论:与地面部位相比,指甲花叶具有更高的抗氧化活性、酚类和类黄酮含量,在改善氧化应激、预防和治疗ISD方面可能更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content of Lawsonia inermis and Haplophyllum vermiculare
Introduction: Continuous exposure of oxidants to the skin may disrupt the antioxidant balance and leads to inflammatory skin diseases (ISD). The aim of the present study was to compare the antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content of two traditionally used plants in ISD, Lawsonia inermis and Haplophyllum vermiculare. Methods: The hydroethanolic extract of the plants was prepared by maceration. Phenolic and flavonoid content of the extracts was measured respectively with Folin-Ciocateu and aluminum chloride methods. The monovalent reducing power and radical scavenging activity were also evaluated respectively by ferric reducing antioxidant power and 2,2-diphenyl-1picryl-hydrazyl methods. Results: The reducing power of Lawsonia inermis (862.89±32.23 μmolFe2+/g) was significantly higher than Haplophyllum vermiculare extract (765.52±29.39 μmolFe2+/g). The radical scavenging activity of Lawsonia inermis extract at a concentration of 1000μg/ml (%65.72±0.77) was also significantly higher than Haplophyllum vermiculare (%36.34±2.52). The higher antioxidant activity of Lawsonia inermis is probably due to its higher phenolic (96.76±3.34μg GAE/mg) and flavonoid content (197.69±5.76μg QE/mg). Conclusion: Henna leaves had higher antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid content compared to aerial parts of Haplophyllum vermiculare, and may be more effective in improving oxidative stress, prevention and treatment of ISD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Physiology and Pharmacology is the official English publication of the Iranian Society of Physiology and Pharmacology. The journal publishes Review articles, Full-length original articles, Letter to editor and Short communications in physiology, pharmacology and related subjects. The aim of this journal is to provide a medium of scientific communication for investigators in the field of Physiology and Pharmacology. The editors will welcome original basic and applied research articles from Physiologists and Pharmacologists. Articles should be in English language. The papers submitted to this journal must not be Published or under consideration for publication elsewhere. Physiology and Pharmacology is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信