模态匹配与模态不匹配感觉反馈的脑图与实验比较

IF 1.5 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Saeed Bahrami Moqadam, Ahmad Saleh Asheghabadi, Farzaneh Norouzi, Nikki Akraminejad, Behruz Shiee Zadeh Yazdi, Jing Xu
{"title":"模态匹配与模态不匹配感觉反馈的脑图与实验比较","authors":"Saeed Bahrami Moqadam, Ahmad Saleh Asheghabadi, Farzaneh Norouzi, Nikki Akraminejad, Behruz Shiee Zadeh Yazdi, Jing Xu","doi":"10.1109/CYBER55403.2022.9907057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two methods of sensory feedback (SF) in prosthetic hands noninvasively by investigating practical experiments, a questionnaire form, and brain activity mapping. The modality-missed-matched sensory feedback (MMM-SF) is per-formed on remnant muscles of the amputated limb using transcutaneous electrical Stimulation (TES). In addition, an armband with multi-modal sensory stimulators is being used for the modality-matched sensory feedback (MM-SF) on the superficial layer of the skin. Both sensory stimulators have been synced with a designed myoelectric bionic hand, equipped with differ-ent sensors to assess surrounding stimuli. The results indicate that the MMM-SF imposes higher cognitive loads on amputee participants than the MM-SF strat-egy. Furthermore, the effects of sensory stimulation by proposed methods have been investigated by brain mapping through quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) and low-resolution brain electromagnetic to-mography (LORETA), which shows that perceived SF in both approaches could assist in recovering the Alpha/Delta-band rhythm balance.","PeriodicalId":34110,"journal":{"name":"IET Cybersystems and Robotics","volume":"47 5 1","pages":"498-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Modality-Matched and Modality-Missed-Matched Sensory Feedback by Brain Mapping and Practical Trials\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Bahrami Moqadam, Ahmad Saleh Asheghabadi, Farzaneh Norouzi, Nikki Akraminejad, Behruz Shiee Zadeh Yazdi, Jing Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CYBER55403.2022.9907057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares two methods of sensory feedback (SF) in prosthetic hands noninvasively by investigating practical experiments, a questionnaire form, and brain activity mapping. The modality-missed-matched sensory feedback (MMM-SF) is per-formed on remnant muscles of the amputated limb using transcutaneous electrical Stimulation (TES). In addition, an armband with multi-modal sensory stimulators is being used for the modality-matched sensory feedback (MM-SF) on the superficial layer of the skin. Both sensory stimulators have been synced with a designed myoelectric bionic hand, equipped with differ-ent sensors to assess surrounding stimuli. The results indicate that the MMM-SF imposes higher cognitive loads on amputee participants than the MM-SF strat-egy. Furthermore, the effects of sensory stimulation by proposed methods have been investigated by brain mapping through quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) and low-resolution brain electromagnetic to-mography (LORETA), which shows that perceived SF in both approaches could assist in recovering the Alpha/Delta-band rhythm balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Cybersystems and Robotics\",\"volume\":\"47 5 1\",\"pages\":\"498-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Cybersystems and Robotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBER55403.2022.9907057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Cybersystems and Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBER55403.2022.9907057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过实际实验、问卷调查和脑活动测绘,比较了两种义肢无创感觉反馈方法。采用经皮电刺激(TES)对残肢残肌进行模态缺失匹配感觉反馈(MMM-SF)。此外,一个带有多模态感觉刺激器的臂章正在被用于皮肤浅层的模态匹配感觉反馈(MM-SF)。这两种感觉刺激器都与设计的肌电仿生手同步,配备不同的传感器来评估周围的刺激。结果表明,MM-SF策略对截肢者的认知负荷高于MM-SF策略。此外,通过定量脑电图(QEEG)和低分辨率脑电磁成像(LORETA)研究了上述方法的感觉刺激效果,结果表明,两种方法感知的SF都有助于恢复α / δ带节奏平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Modality-Matched and Modality-Missed-Matched Sensory Feedback by Brain Mapping and Practical Trials
This paper compares two methods of sensory feedback (SF) in prosthetic hands noninvasively by investigating practical experiments, a questionnaire form, and brain activity mapping. The modality-missed-matched sensory feedback (MMM-SF) is per-formed on remnant muscles of the amputated limb using transcutaneous electrical Stimulation (TES). In addition, an armband with multi-modal sensory stimulators is being used for the modality-matched sensory feedback (MM-SF) on the superficial layer of the skin. Both sensory stimulators have been synced with a designed myoelectric bionic hand, equipped with differ-ent sensors to assess surrounding stimuli. The results indicate that the MMM-SF imposes higher cognitive loads on amputee participants than the MM-SF strat-egy. Furthermore, the effects of sensory stimulation by proposed methods have been investigated by brain mapping through quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) and low-resolution brain electromagnetic to-mography (LORETA), which shows that perceived SF in both approaches could assist in recovering the Alpha/Delta-band rhythm balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Cybersystems and Robotics
IET Cybersystems and Robotics Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信