Thomas A. Grigalunas, James J. Opaluch, Deborah P. French, Mark Reed
{"title":"自然资源损害评估模型体系验证的视角","authors":"Thomas A. Grigalunas, James J. Opaluch, Deborah P. French, Mark Reed","doi":"10.1016/S0269-8579(89)80013-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes a preliminary effort to validate the Natural Resource Damage Assessment Model for Coastal and Marine Environments (NRDAM/ CME). After describing the general requirements that the model should meet, the problems inherent in validating the NRDAM/CME by a retrospective comparison with the results of field studies are reviewed. Due to these problems, an order-of-magnitude standard of accuracy is argued to be appropriate. Comparisons of the model results with those of selected, field studies suggest that the NRDAM/CME provides reasonable results given this standard. In light of the fact that this preliminary validation effort is based on the use of only readily available information for a few studies, additional efforts are in order to validate the model and refine it, as appropriate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100982,"journal":{"name":"Oil and Chemical Pollution","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 217-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0269-8579(89)80013-9","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspective on validating the natural resource damage assessment model system\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A. Grigalunas, James J. Opaluch, Deborah P. French, Mark Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0269-8579(89)80013-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes a preliminary effort to validate the Natural Resource Damage Assessment Model for Coastal and Marine Environments (NRDAM/ CME). After describing the general requirements that the model should meet, the problems inherent in validating the NRDAM/CME by a retrospective comparison with the results of field studies are reviewed. Due to these problems, an order-of-magnitude standard of accuracy is argued to be appropriate. Comparisons of the model results with those of selected, field studies suggest that the NRDAM/CME provides reasonable results given this standard. In light of the fact that this preliminary validation effort is based on the use of only readily available information for a few studies, additional efforts are in order to validate the model and refine it, as appropriate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oil and Chemical Pollution\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0269-8579(89)80013-9\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oil and Chemical Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269857989800139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and Chemical Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269857989800139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perspective on validating the natural resource damage assessment model system
This paper describes a preliminary effort to validate the Natural Resource Damage Assessment Model for Coastal and Marine Environments (NRDAM/ CME). After describing the general requirements that the model should meet, the problems inherent in validating the NRDAM/CME by a retrospective comparison with the results of field studies are reviewed. Due to these problems, an order-of-magnitude standard of accuracy is argued to be appropriate. Comparisons of the model results with those of selected, field studies suggest that the NRDAM/CME provides reasonable results given this standard. In light of the fact that this preliminary validation effort is based on the use of only readily available information for a few studies, additional efforts are in order to validate the model and refine it, as appropriate.