血管内治疗中血管闭塞的当前挑战

A. Rodriguez-Calienes, J. Vivanco-Suarez, M. Dibas, Daniel Casanova, M. Galecio-Castillo, M. Farooqui, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez
{"title":"血管内治疗中血管闭塞的当前挑战","authors":"A. Rodriguez-Calienes, J. Vivanco-Suarez, M. Dibas, Daniel Casanova, M. Galecio-Castillo, M. Farooqui, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2023.1242961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) account for 25%−40% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While mechanical thrombectomy is the standard-of-care for selected patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), there is currently a lack of level I evidence of the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) for MeVOs. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have attempted to answer this relevant clinical question. However, several questions related to the EVT of MeVO stroke may remain unanswered even after successful completion of these trials: What is the optimal EVT approach for secondary MeVOs? Is EVT beneficial for posterior circulation MeVOs? Is pre-EVT intravenous thrombolysis better than EVT alone? What is the optimal first line thrombectomy technique for these lesions? Are the outcome assessment tools used for LVOs appropriate for MeVOs? Upcoming evidence and the natural evolution and development of new technologies will aid in overcoming these challenges.","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current challenges in the endovascular treatment of medium vessel occlusions\",\"authors\":\"A. Rodriguez-Calienes, J. Vivanco-Suarez, M. Dibas, Daniel Casanova, M. Galecio-Castillo, M. Farooqui, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fstro.2023.1242961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) account for 25%−40% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While mechanical thrombectomy is the standard-of-care for selected patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), there is currently a lack of level I evidence of the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) for MeVOs. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have attempted to answer this relevant clinical question. However, several questions related to the EVT of MeVO stroke may remain unanswered even after successful completion of these trials: What is the optimal EVT approach for secondary MeVOs? Is EVT beneficial for posterior circulation MeVOs? Is pre-EVT intravenous thrombolysis better than EVT alone? What is the optimal first line thrombectomy technique for these lesions? Are the outcome assessment tools used for LVOs appropriate for MeVOs? Upcoming evidence and the natural evolution and development of new technologies will aid in overcoming these challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in stroke\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2023.1242961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2023.1242961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中度血管闭塞(MeVOs)占急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的25% - 40%。虽然机械取栓是大血管闭塞(LVO)患者的标准治疗方法,但目前缺乏血管内治疗(EVT)治疗MeVOs的安全性和有效性的一级证据。一些随机临床试验(rct)试图回答这个相关的临床问题。然而,即使在这些试验成功完成后,与MeVO卒中EVT相关的几个问题可能仍然没有答案:继发性MeVO的最佳EVT方法是什么?EVT对后循环MeVOs有益吗?EVT前静脉溶栓比单独EVT好吗?对于这些病变,最佳的一线取栓技术是什么?lvo使用的结果评估工具是否适用于mevo ?即将出现的证据以及新技术的自然进化和发展将有助于克服这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current challenges in the endovascular treatment of medium vessel occlusions
Medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) account for 25%−40% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While mechanical thrombectomy is the standard-of-care for selected patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), there is currently a lack of level I evidence of the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) for MeVOs. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have attempted to answer this relevant clinical question. However, several questions related to the EVT of MeVO stroke may remain unanswered even after successful completion of these trials: What is the optimal EVT approach for secondary MeVOs? Is EVT beneficial for posterior circulation MeVOs? Is pre-EVT intravenous thrombolysis better than EVT alone? What is the optimal first line thrombectomy technique for these lesions? Are the outcome assessment tools used for LVOs appropriate for MeVOs? Upcoming evidence and the natural evolution and development of new technologies will aid in overcoming these challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信