{"title":"评价伊朗火力发电厂部门提高效率和减少损失情景的节能机制","authors":"Mina Masoomi, M. Panahi, Amir Moradihamedani","doi":"10.1080/15567249.2023.2215260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Energy loss is one of the significant challenges in the Electric power industry and demands severe reduction methods. Therefore, this article aimed to illustrate the energy-saving in Iran using Long-Range Energy Alternative Planning model for sustainable development in developing countries. The scenarios, such as the reference scenario, the transmission and distribution losses reduction scenario, and efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenario, are also evaluated in this article, along with their impact on fuel consumption in Iran’s thermal power plants. The results for power plants, fuel consumption in Reference, Transmission and Distribution Losses Reduction, and (Efficiency Improvement and Losses Reduction) scenarios were estimated at 260.6, 223.0, and 110.3 Bcm for 2040. According to the fuel type, the fuel consumed in power plants is −37.5 Bcm in the case of the Reference scenario compared with the Transmission and Distribution Losses Reduction scenario. In addition, fuel consumed in power plants is −131.5 Bcm in the case of the Reference scenario compared with the Ideal Efficiency scenario as 131.5 Bcm would be saved based on the fuel type. The savings will increase as 2040 draws closer. Also, the saved fuel by the Reference scenario was 150.2 Bcm compared to the efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenario for the final year.","PeriodicalId":51247,"journal":{"name":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy-saving mechanisms for evaluating efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenarios in the thermal power plants sector of Iran\",\"authors\":\"Mina Masoomi, M. Panahi, Amir Moradihamedani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15567249.2023.2215260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Energy loss is one of the significant challenges in the Electric power industry and demands severe reduction methods. Therefore, this article aimed to illustrate the energy-saving in Iran using Long-Range Energy Alternative Planning model for sustainable development in developing countries. The scenarios, such as the reference scenario, the transmission and distribution losses reduction scenario, and efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenario, are also evaluated in this article, along with their impact on fuel consumption in Iran’s thermal power plants. The results for power plants, fuel consumption in Reference, Transmission and Distribution Losses Reduction, and (Efficiency Improvement and Losses Reduction) scenarios were estimated at 260.6, 223.0, and 110.3 Bcm for 2040. According to the fuel type, the fuel consumed in power plants is −37.5 Bcm in the case of the Reference scenario compared with the Transmission and Distribution Losses Reduction scenario. In addition, fuel consumed in power plants is −131.5 Bcm in the case of the Reference scenario compared with the Ideal Efficiency scenario as 131.5 Bcm would be saved based on the fuel type. The savings will increase as 2040 draws closer. Also, the saved fuel by the Reference scenario was 150.2 Bcm compared to the efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenario for the final year.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2023.2215260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2023.2215260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy-saving mechanisms for evaluating efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenarios in the thermal power plants sector of Iran
ABSTRACT Energy loss is one of the significant challenges in the Electric power industry and demands severe reduction methods. Therefore, this article aimed to illustrate the energy-saving in Iran using Long-Range Energy Alternative Planning model for sustainable development in developing countries. The scenarios, such as the reference scenario, the transmission and distribution losses reduction scenario, and efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenario, are also evaluated in this article, along with their impact on fuel consumption in Iran’s thermal power plants. The results for power plants, fuel consumption in Reference, Transmission and Distribution Losses Reduction, and (Efficiency Improvement and Losses Reduction) scenarios were estimated at 260.6, 223.0, and 110.3 Bcm for 2040. According to the fuel type, the fuel consumed in power plants is −37.5 Bcm in the case of the Reference scenario compared with the Transmission and Distribution Losses Reduction scenario. In addition, fuel consumed in power plants is −131.5 Bcm in the case of the Reference scenario compared with the Ideal Efficiency scenario as 131.5 Bcm would be saved based on the fuel type. The savings will increase as 2040 draws closer. Also, the saved fuel by the Reference scenario was 150.2 Bcm compared to the efficiency improvement and losses reduction scenario for the final year.
期刊介绍:
12 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: Applied Science & Technology Index; API Abstracts/Literature; Automatic Subject Index Citation; BIOSIS Previews; Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance; Chemical Abstracts; CSA Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts; CSA Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database; CSA Pollution Abstracts; Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences; Directory of Industry Data Sources; Economic Abstracts; Electrical and Electronics Abstracts; Energy Information Abstracts; Energy Research Abstracts; Engineering Index Monthly; Environmental Abstracts; Environmental Periodicals Bibliography (EPB); International Abstracts in Operations Research; Operations/Research/Management Science Abstracts; Petroleum Abstracts; Physikalische Berichte; and Science Citation Index.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .