落实国家保护责任的保证:来自布隆迪实践的教训

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Ferdinand Mbirigi
{"title":"落实国家保护责任的保证:来自布隆迪实践的教训","authors":"Ferdinand Mbirigi","doi":"10.1163/1875984x-20220016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe state’s responsibility to protect is one of the well-established principles of international law recalled by the Resolution a/res/60/1 of 16 September 2005. Given the controversies surrounding the scope of the principle, this paper analyses the practice of its implementation with a particular focus on Burundi which withdrew from the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on 27 October 2017. The reflection consisted in collecting and analysing previous academic works and official documents inter alia national laws, international instruments, official statements, reports, and records of meeting on the responsibility to protect and related topics. The paper demonstrates that Burundi has made progress to build the state’s resilience to atrocity crimes by establishing a deterrent legal framework and institutional mechanisms. Nonetheless, these significant efforts failed to achieve the expected outcomes in terms of legal effect.","PeriodicalId":38207,"journal":{"name":"Global Responsibility to Protect","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assurance for Implementing the State’s Responsibility to Protect: Lessons from Burundian Practice\",\"authors\":\"Ferdinand Mbirigi\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1875984x-20220016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe state’s responsibility to protect is one of the well-established principles of international law recalled by the Resolution a/res/60/1 of 16 September 2005. Given the controversies surrounding the scope of the principle, this paper analyses the practice of its implementation with a particular focus on Burundi which withdrew from the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on 27 October 2017. The reflection consisted in collecting and analysing previous academic works and official documents inter alia national laws, international instruments, official statements, reports, and records of meeting on the responsibility to protect and related topics. The paper demonstrates that Burundi has made progress to build the state’s resilience to atrocity crimes by establishing a deterrent legal framework and institutional mechanisms. Nonetheless, these significant efforts failed to achieve the expected outcomes in terms of legal effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Responsibility to Protect\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Responsibility to Protect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984x-20220016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Responsibility to Protect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984x-20220016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家保护的责任是2005年9月16日第a/res/60/1号决议回顾的公认的国际法原则之一。鉴于围绕该原则范围的争议,本文分析了其实施实践,并特别关注于2017年10月27日退出1998年《国际刑事法院罗马规约》的布隆迪。反思包括收集和分析以往的学术著作和正式文件,特别是国家法律、国际文书、正式声明、报告和关于保护责任及有关专题的会议记录。本文表明,布隆迪通过建立威慑性法律框架和体制机制,在建立国家对暴行犯罪的复原力方面取得了进展。然而,这些重大的努力并没有达到预期的法律效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assurance for Implementing the State’s Responsibility to Protect: Lessons from Burundian Practice
The state’s responsibility to protect is one of the well-established principles of international law recalled by the Resolution a/res/60/1 of 16 September 2005. Given the controversies surrounding the scope of the principle, this paper analyses the practice of its implementation with a particular focus on Burundi which withdrew from the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on 27 October 2017. The reflection consisted in collecting and analysing previous academic works and official documents inter alia national laws, international instruments, official statements, reports, and records of meeting on the responsibility to protect and related topics. The paper demonstrates that Burundi has made progress to build the state’s resilience to atrocity crimes by establishing a deterrent legal framework and institutional mechanisms. Nonetheless, these significant efforts failed to achieve the expected outcomes in terms of legal effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Responsibility to Protect
Global Responsibility to Protect Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
44.40%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信