三维计算机断层扫描数据分析中基于表面和基于图像的质量度量的比较

Francisco A. Arenhart , Vitor C. Nardelli , Gustavo D. Donatelli
{"title":"三维计算机断层扫描数据分析中基于表面和基于图像的质量度量的比较","authors":"Francisco A. Arenhart ,&nbsp;Vitor C. Nardelli ,&nbsp;Gustavo D. Donatelli","doi":"10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comparison of surface-based and image-based quality metrics for dimensional X-ray computed tomography (CT) data. The chosen metrics are used to characterize two key aspects in acquiring signals with CT systems: the loss of information (blurring) and the adding of unwanted information (noise). A set of structured experiments was designed to test the response of the metrics to different influencing factors. It is demonstrated that, under certain circumstances, the results of both types of metrics become conflicting, emphasizing the importance of using surface information for evaluating the quality dimensional CT data. Specific findings using both types of metrics are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100221,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 111-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.002","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of surface-based and image-based quality metrics for the analysis of dimensional computed tomography data\",\"authors\":\"Francisco A. Arenhart ,&nbsp;Vitor C. Nardelli ,&nbsp;Gustavo D. Donatelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comparison of surface-based and image-based quality metrics for dimensional X-ray computed tomography (CT) data. The chosen metrics are used to characterize two key aspects in acquiring signals with CT systems: the loss of information (blurring) and the adding of unwanted information (noise). A set of structured experiments was designed to test the response of the metrics to different influencing factors. It is demonstrated that, under certain circumstances, the results of both types of metrics become conflicting, emphasizing the importance of using surface information for evaluating the quality dimensional CT data. Specific findings using both types of metrics are also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 111-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214657116300119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214657116300119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文介绍了基于表面和基于图像的x射线计算机断层扫描(CT)数据质量度量的比较。所选择的指标用于表征CT系统获取信号的两个关键方面:信息丢失(模糊)和不需要的信息添加(噪声)。设计了一组结构化实验来测试指标对不同影响因素的响应。研究表明,在某些情况下,两种度量的结果会相互冲突,这强调了使用表面信息来评估质量维度CT数据的重要性。还讨论了使用这两种度量标准的具体发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of surface-based and image-based quality metrics for the analysis of dimensional computed tomography data

This paper presents a comparison of surface-based and image-based quality metrics for dimensional X-ray computed tomography (CT) data. The chosen metrics are used to characterize two key aspects in acquiring signals with CT systems: the loss of information (blurring) and the adding of unwanted information (noise). A set of structured experiments was designed to test the response of the metrics to different influencing factors. It is demonstrated that, under certain circumstances, the results of both types of metrics become conflicting, emphasizing the importance of using surface information for evaluating the quality dimensional CT data. Specific findings using both types of metrics are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信