迈向开放存取政策框架:COAR个案研究

Q2 Social Sciences

LIBER Quarterly Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.18352/lq.10227

B. Roy, S. C. Biswas, Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay

{"title":"迈向开放存取政策框架:COAR个案研究","authors":"B. Roy, S. C. Biswas, Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.18352/lq.10227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Open Access (OA) self archiving policies of different Open Access Repositories (OARs) affiliated to COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories) as partner institutes. The process of scrutiny includes three major activities – selection of databases to consult; comparison and evaluation of Open Access policies of repositories listed in the selected databases and attached to COAR group; and critical examination of available self archiving policies of these OA repositories against a set of selected criteria. The above steps lead to reporting the following results: key findings have been identified and highlighted; common practices have been analyzed in relation to the focus of this paper; and a best practice Towards An Open Access Policy Framework: A Case Study of COAR 2 Liber Quarterly Volume 28 2018 benchmark has been suggested for popularizing and strengthening OARs as national research systems. This paper may help administrators, funding agencies, policy makers and professional librarians in devising institutespecific self archiving policies for their own organizations.","PeriodicalId":39179,"journal":{"name":"LIBER Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards An Open Access Policy Framework: A Case Study of COAR\",\"authors\":\"B. Roy, S. C. Biswas, Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.18352/lq.10227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines Open Access (OA) self archiving policies of different Open Access Repositories (OARs) affiliated to COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories) as partner institutes. The process of scrutiny includes three major activities – selection of databases to consult; comparison and evaluation of Open Access policies of repositories listed in the selected databases and attached to COAR group; and critical examination of available self archiving policies of these OA repositories against a set of selected criteria. The above steps lead to reporting the following results: key findings have been identified and highlighted; common practices have been analyzed in relation to the focus of this paper; and a best practice Towards An Open Access Policy Framework: A Case Study of COAR 2 Liber Quarterly Volume 28 2018 benchmark has been suggested for popularizing and strengthening OARs as national research systems. This paper may help administrators, funding agencies, policy makers and professional librarians in devising institutespecific self archiving policies for their own organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIBER Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIBER Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBER Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了作为合作机构加入开放存取资料库联盟(COAR)的不同开放存取资料库(OARs)的开放存取自存档政策。审查过程包括三个主要活动- -选择供参考的数据库;对COAR组所选数据库中所列存储库的开放获取策略进行比较和评估;并根据一组选定的标准对这些OA存储库的可用自归档策略进行严格检查。上述步骤导致报告以下结果:已确定并突出了主要调查结果;分析了与本文重点相关的常见做法;以及开放获取政策框架的最佳实践:COAR案例研究2 Liber季刊2018年第28卷基准已被建议用于推广和加强作为国家研究系统的OARs。本文可以帮助管理人员、资助机构、政策制定者和专业图书馆员为自己的组织制定有针对性的机构自我存档政策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Towards An Open Access Policy Framework: A Case Study of COAR

This paper examines Open Access (OA) self archiving policies of different Open Access Repositories (OARs) affiliated to COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories) as partner institutes. The process of scrutiny includes three major activities – selection of databases to consult; comparison and evaluation of Open Access policies of repositories listed in the selected databases and attached to COAR group; and critical examination of available self archiving policies of these OA repositories against a set of selected criteria. The above steps lead to reporting the following results: key findings have been identified and highlighted; common practices have been analyzed in relation to the focus of this paper; and a best practice Towards An Open Access Policy Framework: A Case Study of COAR 2 Liber Quarterly Volume 28 2018 benchmark has been suggested for popularizing and strengthening OARs as national research systems. This paper may help administrators, funding agencies, policy makers and professional librarians in devising institutespecific self archiving policies for their own organizations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

LIBER Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks