邋遢标签和Metacrap?协同社会标签系统中用户贡献标签的质量

Hongwei Zhu, Harris Wu
{"title":"邋遢标签和Metacrap?协同社会标签系统中用户贡献标签的质量","authors":"Hongwei Zhu, Harris Wu","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1556722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been an increasing number of social tagging systems on the web that allow users to contribute tags collaboratively to describe various resources. As the number of tags continue to grow, it is important that we can describe and measure their quality. There have been conflicting opinions about the quality of user-contributed tags but the issue has not been systematically studied. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a preliminary methodology for assessing tag quality. The methodology identifies three aspects of tag quality in a social tagging system: individual tags, collections of tags, and the association of the tags with the corresponding resources. The proposed methodology is being empirically evaluated using the tags of several social tagging systems. In addition to validating and refining the tag quality assessment methodology, the empirical analysis is expected to provide new findings about various properties of the tags. These findings will be used to improve the design of tagging systems by incorporating mechanisms that induce the contribution of high quality tags.","PeriodicalId":93486,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sloppy Tags and Metacrap? Quality of User Contributed Tags in Collaborative Social Tagging Systems\",\"authors\":\"Hongwei Zhu, Harris Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1556722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There have been an increasing number of social tagging systems on the web that allow users to contribute tags collaboratively to describe various resources. As the number of tags continue to grow, it is important that we can describe and measure their quality. There have been conflicting opinions about the quality of user-contributed tags but the issue has not been systematically studied. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a preliminary methodology for assessing tag quality. The methodology identifies three aspects of tag quality in a social tagging system: individual tags, collections of tags, and the association of the tags with the corresponding resources. The proposed methodology is being empirically evaluated using the tags of several social tagging systems. In addition to validating and refining the tag quality assessment methodology, the empirical analysis is expected to provide new findings about various properties of the tags. These findings will be used to improve the design of tagging systems by incorporating mechanisms that induce the contribution of high quality tags.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1556722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1556722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

网络上有越来越多的社会标签系统,允许用户协作贡献标签来描述各种资源。随着标签数量的不断增长,我们能够描述和衡量它们的质量是很重要的。关于用户贡献标签的质量,一直存在着相互矛盾的观点,但这一问题尚未得到系统的研究。在这篇正在进行的论文中,我们提出了一种评估标签质量的初步方法。该方法确定了社会标签系统中标签质量的三个方面:单个标签、标签集合以及标签与相应资源的关联。所提出的方法正在使用几个社会标签系统的标签进行经验评估。除了验证和完善标签质量评估方法外,实证分析有望提供有关标签各种属性的新发现。这些发现将被用来改进标签系统的设计,通过纳入机制,诱导高质量标签的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sloppy Tags and Metacrap? Quality of User Contributed Tags in Collaborative Social Tagging Systems
There have been an increasing number of social tagging systems on the web that allow users to contribute tags collaboratively to describe various resources. As the number of tags continue to grow, it is important that we can describe and measure their quality. There have been conflicting opinions about the quality of user-contributed tags but the issue has not been systematically studied. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a preliminary methodology for assessing tag quality. The methodology identifies three aspects of tag quality in a social tagging system: individual tags, collections of tags, and the association of the tags with the corresponding resources. The proposed methodology is being empirically evaluated using the tags of several social tagging systems. In addition to validating and refining the tag quality assessment methodology, the empirical analysis is expected to provide new findings about various properties of the tags. These findings will be used to improve the design of tagging systems by incorporating mechanisms that induce the contribution of high quality tags.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信