经验

Christian Sillaber, Andrea Mussmann, R. Breu
{"title":"经验","authors":"Christian Sillaber, Andrea Mussmann, R. Breu","doi":"10.1145/3297721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) managers often struggle to document the current state of their organizations. This is due to the complexity of their IS landscape, the complex regulatory and organizational environment, and the frequent changes to both. GRC tools seek to support them by integrating existing information sources. However, a comprehensive analysis of how the data is managed in such tools, as well as the impact of data quality, is still missing. To build a basis of empirical data, we conducted a series of interviews with information security managers responsible for GRC management activities in their organizations. The results of a qualitative content analysis of these interviews suggest that decision makers largely depend on high-quality documentation but struggle to maintain their documentation at the required level for long periods of time. This work discusses factors affecting the quality of GRC data and information and provides insights into approaches implemented by organizations to analyze, improve, and maintain the quality of their GRC data and information.","PeriodicalId":15582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience\",\"authors\":\"Christian Sillaber, Andrea Mussmann, R. Breu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3297721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) managers often struggle to document the current state of their organizations. This is due to the complexity of their IS landscape, the complex regulatory and organizational environment, and the frequent changes to both. GRC tools seek to support them by integrating existing information sources. However, a comprehensive analysis of how the data is managed in such tools, as well as the impact of data quality, is still missing. To build a basis of empirical data, we conducted a series of interviews with information security managers responsible for GRC management activities in their organizations. The results of a qualitative content analysis of these interviews suggest that decision makers largely depend on high-quality documentation but struggle to maintain their documentation at the required level for long periods of time. This work discusses factors affecting the quality of GRC data and information and provides insights into approaches implemented by organizations to analyze, improve, and maintain the quality of their GRC data and information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3297721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3297721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

治理、风险和遵从性(GRC)管理人员常常难以记录其组织的当前状态。这是由于他们的信息系统环境的复杂性,复杂的监管和组织环境,以及两者的频繁变化。GRC工具试图通过集成现有信息源来支持它们。然而,对这些工具中如何管理数据以及数据质量影响的全面分析仍然缺失。为了建立经验数据的基础,我们对其组织中负责GRC管理活动的信息安全经理进行了一系列访谈。对这些访谈进行定性内容分析的结果表明,决策者在很大程度上依赖于高质量的文件,但很难在很长一段时间内将其文件保持在所需的水平。这项工作讨论了影响GRC数据和信息质量的因素,并为组织实施的方法提供了见解,以分析、改进和保持其GRC数据和信息的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience
Governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) managers often struggle to document the current state of their organizations. This is due to the complexity of their IS landscape, the complex regulatory and organizational environment, and the frequent changes to both. GRC tools seek to support them by integrating existing information sources. However, a comprehensive analysis of how the data is managed in such tools, as well as the impact of data quality, is still missing. To build a basis of empirical data, we conducted a series of interviews with information security managers responsible for GRC management activities in their organizations. The results of a qualitative content analysis of these interviews suggest that decision makers largely depend on high-quality documentation but struggle to maintain their documentation at the required level for long periods of time. This work discusses factors affecting the quality of GRC data and information and provides insights into approaches implemented by organizations to analyze, improve, and maintain the quality of their GRC data and information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信