Lucien cuenot, Richard Goldschmidt和Miquel Crusafont pairo

IF 0.2 4区哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia Pub Date : 2016-06-30 DOI:10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05

A. Casinos

{"title":"Lucien cuenot, Richard Goldschmidt和Miquel Crusafont pairo","authors":"A. Casinos","doi":"10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An unpublished text, corresponding to a communication done by Crusafont Pairo is analysed. The communication is strongly critical with Cuenot’s necrology published previously by Goldschmidt, where he regrets the teleological ideas on evolution that Cuenot maintained in the last years of his life.","PeriodicalId":44082,"journal":{"name":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":"33 1","pages":"126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lucien Cuénot, Richard Goldschmidt y Miquel Crusafont Pairó\",\"authors\":\"A. Casinos\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An unpublished text, corresponding to a communication done by Crusafont Pairo is analysed. The communication is strongly critical with Cuenot’s necrology published previously by Goldschmidt, where he regrets the teleological ideas on evolution that Cuenot maintained in the last years of his life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

一份未发表的文本，对应于Crusafont Pairo所做的通信进行了分析。这封信强烈批评了戈德施米特先前发表的古诺的死亡论，他在书中对古诺在生命的最后几年坚持的进化论的目的论观点表示遗憾。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Lucien Cuénot, Richard Goldschmidt y Miquel Crusafont Pairó

An unpublished text, corresponding to a communication done by Crusafont Pairo is analysed. The communication is strongly critical with Cuenot’s necrology published previously by Goldschmidt, where he regrets the teleological ideas on evolution that Cuenot maintained in the last years of his life.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

50.00%

发文量

审稿时长

53 weeks