Lucien cuenot, Richard Goldschmidt和Miquel Crusafont pairo

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
A. Casinos
{"title":"Lucien cuenot, Richard Goldschmidt和Miquel Crusafont pairo","authors":"A. Casinos","doi":"10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An unpublished text, corresponding to a communication done by Crusafont Pairo is analysed. The communication is strongly critical with Cuenot’s necrology published previously by Goldschmidt, where he regrets the teleological ideas on evolution that Cuenot maintained in the last years of his life.","PeriodicalId":44082,"journal":{"name":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lucien Cuénot, Richard Goldschmidt y Miquel Crusafont Pairó\",\"authors\":\"A. Casinos\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An unpublished text, corresponding to a communication done by Crusafont Pairo is analysed. The communication is strongly critical with Cuenot’s necrology published previously by Goldschmidt, where he regrets the teleological ideas on evolution that Cuenot maintained in the last years of his life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ASCLEPIO.2016.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一份未发表的文本,对应于Crusafont Pairo所做的通信进行了分析。这封信强烈批评了戈德施米特先前发表的古诺的死亡论,他在书中对古诺在生命的最后几年坚持的进化论的目的论观点表示遗憾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lucien Cuénot, Richard Goldschmidt y Miquel Crusafont Pairó
An unpublished text, corresponding to a communication done by Crusafont Pairo is analysed. The communication is strongly critical with Cuenot’s necrology published previously by Goldschmidt, where he regrets the teleological ideas on evolution that Cuenot maintained in the last years of his life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信