知识耦合与组织弹性:市场导向的调节作用

IF 1.7 4区管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Science Technology and Society Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1177/09717218231178343

Dong Wu, Tanfei Liu, Wen Yang, Xinyuan Cui

{"title":"知识耦合与组织弹性:市场导向的调节作用","authors":"Dong Wu, Tanfei Liu, Wen Yang, Xinyuan Cui","doi":"10.1177/09717218231178343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conducts an empirical study on the relationship between knowledge coupling and organizational resilience based on the knowledge-based view. Meanwhile, market orientation is considered a moderating variable because of its role in this transmission mechanism. The hypotheses are tested through a survey of 359 Chinese manufacturing firms. The results show that both complementary knowledge coupling and substitutive knowledge coupling have significant positive impacts on organizational resilience, and the proactive market orientation positively moderates the relationship between complementary/substitutive knowledge coupling and organizational resilience, while the responsive market orientation negatively moderates the relationship between complementary knowledge coupling and organizational resilience. In the context of the current globalization of the COVID-19 epidemic, this study explores the critical factors needed to survive and develop by firms in adversity, which enriches the research on organizational resilience and market orientation theory and provides suggestions for firms’ strategic planning.","PeriodicalId":45432,"journal":{"name":"Science Technology and Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"444 - 462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Coupling and Organizational Resilience: The Moderating Effect of Market Orientation\",\"authors\":\"Dong Wu, Tanfei Liu, Wen Yang, Xinyuan Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09717218231178343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study conducts an empirical study on the relationship between knowledge coupling and organizational resilience based on the knowledge-based view. Meanwhile, market orientation is considered a moderating variable because of its role in this transmission mechanism. The hypotheses are tested through a survey of 359 Chinese manufacturing firms. The results show that both complementary knowledge coupling and substitutive knowledge coupling have significant positive impacts on organizational resilience, and the proactive market orientation positively moderates the relationship between complementary/substitutive knowledge coupling and organizational resilience, while the responsive market orientation negatively moderates the relationship between complementary knowledge coupling and organizational resilience. In the context of the current globalization of the COVID-19 epidemic, this study explores the critical factors needed to survive and develop by firms in adversity, which enriches the research on organizational resilience and market orientation theory and provides suggestions for firms’ strategic planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Technology and Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"444 - 462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Technology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231178343\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231178343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于知识视角对知识耦合与组织弹性的关系进行了实证研究。同时，由于市场导向在这一传导机制中的作用，它被认为是一个调节变量。通过对359家中国制造企业的调查，验证了这些假设。结果表明:互补知识耦合和替代知识耦合对组织弹性均有显著的正向影响，其中，主动市场导向正向调节互补/替代知识耦合与组织弹性的关系，而响应型市场导向负向调节互补知识耦合与组织弹性的关系。在当前新冠疫情全球化的背景下，本研究探讨了企业在逆境中生存和发展所需的关键因素，丰富了组织弹性和市场导向理论的研究，为企业的战略规划提供了建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Knowledge Coupling and Organizational Resilience: The Moderating Effect of Market Orientation

This study conducts an empirical study on the relationship between knowledge coupling and organizational resilience based on the knowledge-based view. Meanwhile, market orientation is considered a moderating variable because of its role in this transmission mechanism. The hypotheses are tested through a survey of 359 Chinese manufacturing firms. The results show that both complementary knowledge coupling and substitutive knowledge coupling have significant positive impacts on organizational resilience, and the proactive market orientation positively moderates the relationship between complementary/substitutive knowledge coupling and organizational resilience, while the responsive market orientation negatively moderates the relationship between complementary knowledge coupling and organizational resilience. In the context of the current globalization of the COVID-19 epidemic, this study explores the critical factors needed to survive and develop by firms in adversity, which enriches the research on organizational resilience and market orientation theory and provides suggestions for firms’ strategic planning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Science Technology and Society MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

4.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Science, Technology and Society is an international journal devoted to the study of science and technology in social context. It focuses on the way in which advances in science and technology influence society and vice versa. It is a peer-reviewed journal that takes an interdisciplinary perspective, encouraging analyses whose approaches are drawn from a variety of disciplines such as history, sociology, philosophy, economics, political science and international relations, science policy involving innovation, foresight studies involving science and technology, technology management, environmental studies, energy studies and gender studies. The journal consciously endeavors to combine scholarly perspectives relevant to academic research and policy issues relating to development. Besides research articles the journal encourages research-based country reports, commentaries and book reviews.