短传播——苏丹绵羊小反刍害虫血清转化水平的比较研究。

IF 1.9 4区农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES

Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.20506/rst.39.3.3193

A. M. Hassan, K.H. AL MALIK, A.M. SHEIKH DEEN, K.M. AL FAKI, M. Abdel Aziz, H.Y. MOHAMMED AHMED, T. Angra

{"title":"短传播——苏丹绵羊小反刍害虫血清转化水平的比较研究。","authors":"A. M. Hassan, K.H. AL MALIK, A.M. SHEIKH DEEN, K.M. AL FAKI, M. Abdel Aziz, H.Y. MOHAMMED AHMED, T. Angra","doi":"10.20506/rst.39.3.3193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is endemic to Sudan. It is considered as a priority disease in the list of transboundary animal diseases (TADs). The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the detection of PPR antibodies by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) in naturally infected or vaccinated sheep. Sera were collected from 3,186 sheep from flocks located in six states of Sudan and additionally 100 sheep were vaccinated with a PPR homologous vaccine (produced locally) in a quarantine station. The percentages of PPR antibody-positive sera from the field varied between 72% and 100%, according to state. All sheep vaccinated in the quarantine station were PPR-seropositive. This study shows, first, that the percentages of PPR-seropositive animals were all very high, whether naturally infected or vaccinated. It also shows the reliability of the cELISA test used in this study.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"97 1","pages":"1017-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short communication - Comparative study on peste des petits ruminants seroconversion level in sheep in Sudan.\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Hassan, K.H. AL MALIK, A.M. SHEIKH DEEN, K.M. AL FAKI, M. Abdel Aziz, H.Y. MOHAMMED AHMED, T. Angra\",\"doi\":\"10.20506/rst.39.3.3193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is endemic to Sudan. It is considered as a priority disease in the list of transboundary animal diseases (TADs). The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the detection of PPR antibodies by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) in naturally infected or vaccinated sheep. Sera were collected from 3,186 sheep from flocks located in six states of Sudan and additionally 100 sheep were vaccinated with a PPR homologous vaccine (produced locally) in a quarantine station. The percentages of PPR antibody-positive sera from the field varied between 72% and 100%, according to state. All sheep vaccinated in the quarantine station were PPR-seropositive. This study shows, first, that the percentages of PPR-seropositive animals were all very high, whether naturally infected or vaccinated. It also shows the reliability of the cELISA test used in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"1017-1021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.39.3.3193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.39.3.3193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

小反刍兽疫(PPR)是苏丹的地方病。它被认为是跨界动物疾病(TADs)清单中的重点疾病。本研究的目的是评估通过竞争性酶联免疫吸附试验(cELISA)在自然感染或接种绵羊中检测小反刍兽疫抗体的可靠性。从苏丹6个州的羊群中收集了3186只羊的血清，另外在一个检疫站对100只羊接种了小反刍兽疫同源疫苗(当地生产)。据国家统计，现场小反刍兽疫抗体阳性血清的百分比在72%到100%之间变化。在检疫站接种的绵羊均为ppr血清阳性。这项研究表明，首先，无论是自然感染还是接种疫苗，ppr血清阳性动物的百分比都非常高。这也表明了本研究中使用的cELISA测试的可靠性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Short communication - Comparative study on peste des petits ruminants seroconversion level in sheep in Sudan.

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is endemic to Sudan. It is considered as a priority disease in the list of transboundary animal diseases (TADs). The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the detection of PPR antibodies by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) in naturally infected or vaccinated sheep. Sera were collected from 3,186 sheep from flocks located in six states of Sudan and additionally 100 sheep were vaccinated with a PPR homologous vaccine (produced locally) in a quarantine station. The percentages of PPR antibody-positive sera from the field varied between 72% and 100%, according to state. All sheep vaccinated in the quarantine station were PPR-seropositive. This study shows, first, that the percentages of PPR-seropositive animals were all very high, whether naturally infected or vaccinated. It also shows the reliability of the cELISA test used in this study.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties 农林科学-兽医学

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>24 weeks

期刊介绍： The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.