茶碱治疗药物监测服务评价

Q4 Medicine
Neža Rugelj, K. Trobec, M. Pišlar, P. M. Brguljan, M. Košnik, A. Mrhar
{"title":"茶碱治疗药物监测服务评价","authors":"Neža Rugelj, K. Trobec, M. Pišlar, P. M. Brguljan, M. Košnik, A. Mrhar","doi":"10.6016/ZDRAVVESTN.1174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Therapeutic monitoring of theophylline serum levels is required due to its narrow therapeutic range and marked interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. We evaluated therapeutic drug monitoring service for theophylline in Slovenian clinical setting, which currently includes no pharmacokinetic evaluation of measured theophylline serum concentrations. Methods We  retrospectively evaluated 127 randomly selected theophylline serum level determinations performed in 2010 in a tertiary clinical setting in Slovenia. Demographic data, information on theophylline dosing and blood sampling was collected from patients’ data files. Authors evaluated the appropriateness of the following procedures: indications for theophylline serum concentration measurement, timing of blood sampling and dosage adjustments made after theophylline levels had been reported. On the basis of collected data, population pharmacokinetic model for theophylline was built and further used for the evaluation of dosage adjustments. Results Out of 127 cases, 107 (84.3%) had clinically justified indication for theophylline serum level measurement. Near half of measurements (44.9%) were performed before the steady state of theophylline concentrations was established. 65% of measured concentrations were subtherapeutic and the average measured concentration was below therapeutic range (53.1 μmol/L). Despite subtherapeutic concentrations the dose of theophylline was mainly not increased. Pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of average optimal daily dose which was significantly higher than the average actual daily dose used (876 mg vs. 572 mg, p < 0.001). Conclusions Theophylline TDM service should be optimized and pharmacokinetic interpretation of theophylline serum levels should be integrated into clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":49350,"journal":{"name":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"36 12","pages":"191-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of theophylline therapeutic drug monitoring service\",\"authors\":\"Neža Rugelj, K. Trobec, M. Pišlar, P. M. Brguljan, M. Košnik, A. Mrhar\",\"doi\":\"10.6016/ZDRAVVESTN.1174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Therapeutic monitoring of theophylline serum levels is required due to its narrow therapeutic range and marked interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. We evaluated therapeutic drug monitoring service for theophylline in Slovenian clinical setting, which currently includes no pharmacokinetic evaluation of measured theophylline serum concentrations. Methods We  retrospectively evaluated 127 randomly selected theophylline serum level determinations performed in 2010 in a tertiary clinical setting in Slovenia. Demographic data, information on theophylline dosing and blood sampling was collected from patients’ data files. Authors evaluated the appropriateness of the following procedures: indications for theophylline serum concentration measurement, timing of blood sampling and dosage adjustments made after theophylline levels had been reported. On the basis of collected data, population pharmacokinetic model for theophylline was built and further used for the evaluation of dosage adjustments. Results Out of 127 cases, 107 (84.3%) had clinically justified indication for theophylline serum level measurement. Near half of measurements (44.9%) were performed before the steady state of theophylline concentrations was established. 65% of measured concentrations were subtherapeutic and the average measured concentration was below therapeutic range (53.1 μmol/L). Despite subtherapeutic concentrations the dose of theophylline was mainly not increased. Pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of average optimal daily dose which was significantly higher than the average actual daily dose used (876 mg vs. 572 mg, p < 0.001). Conclusions Theophylline TDM service should be optimized and pharmacokinetic interpretation of theophylline serum levels should be integrated into clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 12\",\"pages\":\"191-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6016/ZDRAVVESTN.1174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/ZDRAVVESTN.1174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:由于茶碱的治疗范围窄,个体间药代动力学差异明显,因此需要对茶碱的血清水平进行治疗性监测。我们评估了斯洛文尼亚临床环境中茶碱的治疗药物监测服务,目前没有对测量的茶碱血清浓度进行药代动力学评估。方法回顾性评估2010年在斯洛文尼亚三级临床环境中随机选择的127例茶碱血清水平测定。从患者数据档案中收集人口统计数据、茶碱剂量信息和血样。作者评估了以下程序的适当性:茶碱血清浓度测量的适应症,采血时间和报告茶碱水平后进行的剂量调整。在收集数据的基础上,建立了茶碱的群体药动学模型,并进一步用于剂量调整的评价。结果127例患者中有107例(84.3%)有临床合理的指征。近一半(44.9%)的测量是在茶碱浓度稳定状态建立之前进行的。65%的测量浓度为亚治疗浓度,平均测量浓度低于治疗范围(53.1 μmol/L)。尽管浓度低于治疗水平,但茶碱的剂量基本没有增加。药代动力学模型使平均最佳日剂量的计算显著高于平均实际日剂量(876 mg vs. 572 mg, p < 0.001)。结论应优化茶碱TDM服务,将茶碱血清药代动力学解释纳入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of theophylline therapeutic drug monitoring service
Background Therapeutic monitoring of theophylline serum levels is required due to its narrow therapeutic range and marked interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. We evaluated therapeutic drug monitoring service for theophylline in Slovenian clinical setting, which currently includes no pharmacokinetic evaluation of measured theophylline serum concentrations. Methods We  retrospectively evaluated 127 randomly selected theophylline serum level determinations performed in 2010 in a tertiary clinical setting in Slovenia. Demographic data, information on theophylline dosing and blood sampling was collected from patients’ data files. Authors evaluated the appropriateness of the following procedures: indications for theophylline serum concentration measurement, timing of blood sampling and dosage adjustments made after theophylline levels had been reported. On the basis of collected data, population pharmacokinetic model for theophylline was built and further used for the evaluation of dosage adjustments. Results Out of 127 cases, 107 (84.3%) had clinically justified indication for theophylline serum level measurement. Near half of measurements (44.9%) were performed before the steady state of theophylline concentrations was established. 65% of measured concentrations were subtherapeutic and the average measured concentration was below therapeutic range (53.1 μmol/L). Despite subtherapeutic concentrations the dose of theophylline was mainly not increased. Pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of average optimal daily dose which was significantly higher than the average actual daily dose used (876 mg vs. 572 mg, p < 0.001). Conclusions Theophylline TDM service should be optimized and pharmacokinetic interpretation of theophylline serum levels should be integrated into clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信