关系维持行为与关系满意度的性别差异

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
V. Legkauskas, Gintarė Paznionaitė
{"title":"关系维持行为与关系满意度的性别差异","authors":"V. Legkauskas, Gintarė Paznionaitė","doi":"10.21277/SW.V2I8.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in how perceived use of relationship maintenance strategies by a partner is linked to subject’s relationship satisfaction in a Lithuanian sample. The sample consisted of 472 participants in committed romantic relationship, including 389 women and 83 men with a mean age of 21.89 years. The sample included 232 participants in dating relationship, 216 cohabiting and 24 married. Mean relationship duration was 31.91 months. Stafford’s (2011) Relationship Maintenance Behaviors Measure was used to assess relationship maintenance, while relationship satisfaction was measured by Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) of Funk and Rogge (2007). Results of the study indicated that women perceived their partners using more positivity, understanding, assurances, sharing tasks, and social network strategies than men did. While no statistically significant gender differences in relationship satisfaction were found, all relationship maintenance strategies were positively correlated with relationship satisfaction for both men and women. However, strategies contributing towards prediction of relationship satisfaction differed for men and women. For women, relationship satisfaction was best predicted by perceived assurances, followed by understanding, positivity, and self-disclosure, which collectively accounted for just under 40% of variance in relationship satisfaction. For men, only perceived partner’s positivity was significant predictor of relationship satisfaction, but it alone accounted for 51.6 percent of variance in relationship satisfaction. Neither relationship status nor relationship duration were significant in predicting relationship satisfaction of either men or women.","PeriodicalId":41093,"journal":{"name":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences In Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Relationship Satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"V. Legkauskas, Gintarė Paznionaitė\",\"doi\":\"10.21277/SW.V2I8.367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in how perceived use of relationship maintenance strategies by a partner is linked to subject’s relationship satisfaction in a Lithuanian sample. The sample consisted of 472 participants in committed romantic relationship, including 389 women and 83 men with a mean age of 21.89 years. The sample included 232 participants in dating relationship, 216 cohabiting and 24 married. Mean relationship duration was 31.91 months. Stafford’s (2011) Relationship Maintenance Behaviors Measure was used to assess relationship maintenance, while relationship satisfaction was measured by Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) of Funk and Rogge (2007). Results of the study indicated that women perceived their partners using more positivity, understanding, assurances, sharing tasks, and social network strategies than men did. While no statistically significant gender differences in relationship satisfaction were found, all relationship maintenance strategies were positively correlated with relationship satisfaction for both men and women. However, strategies contributing towards prediction of relationship satisfaction differed for men and women. For women, relationship satisfaction was best predicted by perceived assurances, followed by understanding, positivity, and self-disclosure, which collectively accounted for just under 40% of variance in relationship satisfaction. For men, only perceived partner’s positivity was significant predictor of relationship satisfaction, but it alone accounted for 51.6 percent of variance in relationship satisfaction. Neither relationship status nor relationship duration were significant in predicting relationship satisfaction of either men or women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21277/SW.V2I8.367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21277/SW.V2I8.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究调查了立陶宛样本中,伴侣对关系维护策略的感知使用与受试者的关系满意度之间是否存在性别差异。样本包括472名有固定恋爱关系的参与者,其中包括389名女性和83名男性,平均年龄为21.89岁。样本包括232名约会对象、216名同居对象和24名已婚人士。平均恋爱时间为31.91个月。我们使用Stafford(2011)的关系维持行为量表来评估关系维持,而关系满意度则使用Funk和Rogge(2007)的夫妻满意度指数(CSI-32)来衡量。研究结果表明,女性比男性更积极地看待伴侣,理解、保证、分担任务和社交网络策略。虽然在关系满意度上没有发现统计学上显著的性别差异,但所有的关系维护策略都与男性和女性的关系满意度呈正相关。然而,对两性关系满意度的预测策略有所不同。对于女性来说,关系满意度最好通过感知保证来预测,其次是理解、积极性和自我表露,这些因素加起来占关系满意度方差的近40%。对于男性来说,只有感知到伴侣的积极态度是关系满意度的重要预测因素,但它本身就占了关系满意度方差的51.6%。关系状态和关系持续时间在预测男女关系满意度方面都不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Differences In Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Relationship Satisfaction
The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in how perceived use of relationship maintenance strategies by a partner is linked to subject’s relationship satisfaction in a Lithuanian sample. The sample consisted of 472 participants in committed romantic relationship, including 389 women and 83 men with a mean age of 21.89 years. The sample included 232 participants in dating relationship, 216 cohabiting and 24 married. Mean relationship duration was 31.91 months. Stafford’s (2011) Relationship Maintenance Behaviors Measure was used to assess relationship maintenance, while relationship satisfaction was measured by Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) of Funk and Rogge (2007). Results of the study indicated that women perceived their partners using more positivity, understanding, assurances, sharing tasks, and social network strategies than men did. While no statistically significant gender differences in relationship satisfaction were found, all relationship maintenance strategies were positively correlated with relationship satisfaction for both men and women. However, strategies contributing towards prediction of relationship satisfaction differed for men and women. For women, relationship satisfaction was best predicted by perceived assurances, followed by understanding, positivity, and self-disclosure, which collectively accounted for just under 40% of variance in relationship satisfaction. For men, only perceived partner’s positivity was significant predictor of relationship satisfaction, but it alone accounted for 51.6 percent of variance in relationship satisfaction. Neither relationship status nor relationship duration were significant in predicting relationship satisfaction of either men or women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信