裂变和聚变反应堆安全特征比较图

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Tu Nguyen, E. Patterson, Richard J. K. Taylor, Y. Tseng, C. Waldon
{"title":"裂变和聚变反应堆安全特征比较图","authors":"Tu Nguyen, E. Patterson, Richard J. K. Taylor, Y. Tseng, C. Waldon","doi":"10.1115/1.4062643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The differences between nuclear fission and fusion have been discussed widely in the literature. However, little has been done to investigate the key differences in safety designs and regulatory requirements between the nuclear reactor types. In this study, an innovative methodology was successfully developed to map nuclear safety features to the fundamental safety principles set out by the nuclear regulators. Three safety cases were assessed in the mapping study, a research fusion reactor (Joint European Torus), a research fission reactor (Tsing Hua Open-pool Reactor) and a commercial fission reactor (Hinkley Point C). The graphical representation allowed a comparative analysis of the safety features and fundamental principles which revealed differences between the hazard profiles of fission and fusion reactors and provided important insights for the creation of a similar map for a future commercial fusion device.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Maps of Safety Features for Fission and Fusion Reactors\",\"authors\":\"Tu Nguyen, E. Patterson, Richard J. K. Taylor, Y. Tseng, C. Waldon\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4062643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The differences between nuclear fission and fusion have been discussed widely in the literature. However, little has been done to investigate the key differences in safety designs and regulatory requirements between the nuclear reactor types. In this study, an innovative methodology was successfully developed to map nuclear safety features to the fundamental safety principles set out by the nuclear regulators. Three safety cases were assessed in the mapping study, a research fusion reactor (Joint European Torus), a research fission reactor (Tsing Hua Open-pool Reactor) and a commercial fission reactor (Hinkley Point C). The graphical representation allowed a comparative analysis of the safety features and fundamental principles which revealed differences between the hazard profiles of fission and fusion reactors and provided important insights for the creation of a similar map for a future commercial fusion device.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核裂变和核聚变的区别在文献中被广泛讨论。然而,对不同类型核反应堆在安全设计和监管要求方面的关键差异进行调查的工作却很少。在这项研究中,成功地开发了一种创新的方法,将核安全特征与核监管机构制定的基本安全原则相结合。在绘图研究中评估了三个安全案例,一个研究核聚变反应堆(联合欧洲环),一个研究裂变反应堆(清华开池反应堆)和一个商业裂变反应堆(欣克利角C)。图形表示允许对安全特征和基本原理进行比较分析,从而揭示了裂变反应堆和聚变反应堆的危险概况之间的差异,并为创建未来商业聚变装置的类似地图提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Maps of Safety Features for Fission and Fusion Reactors
The differences between nuclear fission and fusion have been discussed widely in the literature. However, little has been done to investigate the key differences in safety designs and regulatory requirements between the nuclear reactor types. In this study, an innovative methodology was successfully developed to map nuclear safety features to the fundamental safety principles set out by the nuclear regulators. Three safety cases were assessed in the mapping study, a research fusion reactor (Joint European Torus), a research fission reactor (Tsing Hua Open-pool Reactor) and a commercial fission reactor (Hinkley Point C). The graphical representation allowed a comparative analysis of the safety features and fundamental principles which revealed differences between the hazard profiles of fission and fusion reactors and provided important insights for the creation of a similar map for a future commercial fusion device.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信