机器人左肝切除术中胆囊保存的可行性:回顾性比较研究

Q3 Medicine
Kit-Fai Lee, Andrew KY. Fung, Hon-Ting Lok, Janet WC. Kung, Eugene YJ. Lo, Charing CN. Chong, John Wong, Kelvin KC. Ng
{"title":"机器人左肝切除术中胆囊保存的可行性:回顾性比较研究","authors":"Kit-Fai Lee,&nbsp;Andrew KY. Fung,&nbsp;Hon-Ting Lok,&nbsp;Janet WC. Kung,&nbsp;Eugene YJ. Lo,&nbsp;Charing CN. Chong,&nbsp;John Wong,&nbsp;Kelvin KC. Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, <em>p</em> = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, <em>p</em> = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000275/pdfft?md5=3469a1803f7c90943b3e75bd197b6cb1&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900922000275-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Kit-Fai Lee,&nbsp;Andrew KY. Fung,&nbsp;Hon-Ting Lok,&nbsp;Janet WC. Kung,&nbsp;Eugene YJ. Lo,&nbsp;Charing CN. Chong,&nbsp;John Wong,&nbsp;Kelvin KC. Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, <em>p</em> = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, <em>p</em> = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 100-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000275/pdfft?md5=3469a1803f7c90943b3e75bd197b6cb1&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900922000275-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的传统上,即使没有胆囊病变,在左肝切除术中也要常规切除胆囊。然而,胆囊切除术后的不良反应虽罕见,但仍偶有发生。本研究旨在评估机器人左肝切除术中胆囊保留的可行性。方法从前瞻性收集的数据库中检索2010年12月至2022年1月香港中文大学威尔斯亲王医院所有连续机器人左肝切除术病例。通过将肝横切线移离胆囊窝来保存胆囊。患者分为胆囊保存组(GBP)和非胆囊保存组(NGBP)。比较两组手术结果及远期疗效。结果GBP组11例,NGBP组25例。两组在患者人口统计学和疾病特征方面具有可比性。无手术死亡率。两组在手术时间(GBP 270 min vs NGBP 332 min, p = 0.132)、出血量(GBP 50 mL vs NGBP 150 mL, p = 0.115)和并发症发生率(GBP 27.3% vs NGBP 24.0%, p >0.999)。5年总生存率也无差异。在GBP组中,没有患者出现与保留胆囊相关的特定症状或并发症。随访超声或计算机断层扫描显示保存完好的胆囊外观正常,但有一名患者出现了3毫米胆囊息肉。另一方面,NGBP组中有1例(4%)患者在手术后出现了令人头痛的腹泻。结论机器人左肝切除术中全膀胱保留是安全可行的。保留的胆囊不会导致任何症状,而胆囊切除术后腹泻可避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy: A retrospective comparative study

Objective

Traditionally, gallbladder is routinely removed during left hepatectomy even if there is no gallbladder pathology. However, adverse consequence after cholecystectomy, though rare, still occasionally occurs. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of gallbladder preservation during robotic left hepatectomy.

Methods

All consecutive robotic left hepatectomy cases between December 2010 and January 2022 in Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. The gallbladder was preserved by moving the liver transection line just away from the gallbladder fossa. Patients were divided into two groups: gallbladder preservation (GBP) and non-gallbladder preservation (NGBP). Operative results and long-term outcomes were compared between these two groups.

Results

There were 11 cases in the GBP group and 25 cases in the NGBP group. The two groups were comparable in terms of the patient demographics and disease characteristics. There was no operative mortality. There was no difference between the two groups in operative time (GBP 270 min vs. NGBP 332 min, p = 0.132), blood loss (GBP 50 mL vs. NGBP 150 mL, p = 0.115) or complication rate (GBP 27.3% vs. NGBP 24.0%, p > 0.999). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival. In the GBP group, no patient developed specific symptoms or complications related to the preserved gallbladder. Follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography revealed a normal appearance of the preserved gallbladders except in one patient who developed a 3-mm gallbladder polyp. On the other hand, one (4%) patient in the NGBP group developed troublesome diarrhoea after surgery.

Conclusion

Gallbladder preservation is safe and feasible during robotic left hepatectomy. The preserved gallbladder does not lead to any symptoms, while postcholecystectomy diarrhoea can be avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信