运用数字形成性评价评价英语学习者的英语口语能力

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zeynep Çetin Köroğlu
{"title":"运用数字形成性评价评价英语学习者的英语口语能力","authors":"Zeynep Çetin Köroğlu","doi":"10.26817/16925777.1001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As it is known formative assessment focuses on both the learning process and learner's performance. In this study digital formative assessment and traditional speaking tests were utilized comparatively to evaluate 52 upper-intermediate EFL learners' English language speaking skills. The study was designed as a mixed-method. The quantitative data were collected via achievement tests which had been administered both in traditional speaking tests and digital formative tests. The qualitative findings were collected with students' interviews which consisted of four open-ended questions. The results of the study showed that participants outperformed in digital formative tests in comparison to traditional speaking tests. Another significant finding of the study is that participants are satisfied with the digital formative assessments in terms of peer collaboration during tests, enriched test materials, and preparation time for the speaking test. Although they have positive views on digital formative assessment, participants are dissatisfied with it in terms of technical problems that they encountered during the administration of digital formative tests.","PeriodicalId":42765,"journal":{"name":"GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Digital Formative Assessment to Evaluate EFL Learners’ English Speaking Skills\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Çetin Köroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.26817/16925777.1001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As it is known formative assessment focuses on both the learning process and learner's performance. In this study digital formative assessment and traditional speaking tests were utilized comparatively to evaluate 52 upper-intermediate EFL learners' English language speaking skills. The study was designed as a mixed-method. The quantitative data were collected via achievement tests which had been administered both in traditional speaking tests and digital formative tests. The qualitative findings were collected with students' interviews which consisted of four open-ended questions. The results of the study showed that participants outperformed in digital formative tests in comparison to traditional speaking tests. Another significant finding of the study is that participants are satisfied with the digital formative assessments in terms of peer collaboration during tests, enriched test materials, and preparation time for the speaking test. Although they have positive views on digital formative assessment, participants are dissatisfied with it in terms of technical problems that they encountered during the administration of digital formative tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

众所周知,形成性评价既关注学习过程,也关注学习者的表现。本研究采用数字化形成性测验与传统口语测验相比较,对52名中上英语学习者的英语口语能力进行了测评。本研究采用混合方法设计。定量数据是通过成绩测试收集的,这些成绩测试在传统的口语测试和数字化的形成性测试中进行。定性调查结果收集了学生的采访,其中包括四个开放式问题。研究结果表明,与传统的口语测试相比,参与者在数字形成性测试中的表现更好。研究的另一个重要发现是,参与者在测试过程中的同伴协作、丰富的测试材料和口语测试的准备时间方面对数字化形成性评估感到满意。虽然他们对数字化形成性评估持积极态度,但就他们在数字化形成性测试的管理过程中遇到的技术问题而言,参与者并不满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Digital Formative Assessment to Evaluate EFL Learners’ English Speaking Skills
As it is known formative assessment focuses on both the learning process and learner's performance. In this study digital formative assessment and traditional speaking tests were utilized comparatively to evaluate 52 upper-intermediate EFL learners' English language speaking skills. The study was designed as a mixed-method. The quantitative data were collected via achievement tests which had been administered both in traditional speaking tests and digital formative tests. The qualitative findings were collected with students' interviews which consisted of four open-ended questions. The results of the study showed that participants outperformed in digital formative tests in comparison to traditional speaking tests. Another significant finding of the study is that participants are satisfied with the digital formative assessments in terms of peer collaboration during tests, enriched test materials, and preparation time for the speaking test. Although they have positive views on digital formative assessment, participants are dissatisfied with it in terms of technical problems that they encountered during the administration of digital formative tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal
GIST-Education and Learning Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信