政策制定者如何利用现有证据证明药物治疗的成本效益?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Christine Godfrey, Steve Parrott
{"title":"政策制定者如何利用现有证据证明药物治疗的成本效益?","authors":"Christine Godfrey,&nbsp;Steve Parrott","doi":"10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<55::AID-MHP70>3.0.CO;2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>All the studies on the cost benefits of drug treatment reviewed by Cartwright in this issue suggest benefits outweigh costs by some margin. What lessons does this review of mainly American data have for European policy makers? Drug treatments are associated with a wide range of consequences outside the health sector and there are considerable differences in treatment regimes across countries. This could well influence results. There are also considerable differences in methodologies used across available studies and many lack strong study designs. An interesting feature is the lack of valuation of individual drug users benefits, does this imply that policy makers in the US do not care about drug misusers. Would the situation be the same in Europe or other parts of the world? There is a lot of research to be done and perhaps specific guidelines are required to ensure economic evaluations in this area can be used to guide policy decisions with more confidence. Copyright ©2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"3 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<55::AID-MHP70>3.0.CO;2-1","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can policy makers use available evidence on the cost benefits of drug treatement?\",\"authors\":\"Christine Godfrey,&nbsp;Steve Parrott\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<55::AID-MHP70>3.0.CO;2-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>All the studies on the cost benefits of drug treatment reviewed by Cartwright in this issue suggest benefits outweigh costs by some margin. What lessons does this review of mainly American data have for European policy makers? Drug treatments are associated with a wide range of consequences outside the health sector and there are considerable differences in treatment regimes across countries. This could well influence results. There are also considerable differences in methodologies used across available studies and many lack strong study designs. An interesting feature is the lack of valuation of individual drug users benefits, does this imply that policy makers in the US do not care about drug misusers. Would the situation be the same in Europe or other parts of the world? There is a lot of research to be done and perhaps specific guidelines are required to ensure economic evaluations in this area can be used to guide policy decisions with more confidence. Copyright ©2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<55::AID-MHP70>3.0.CO;2-1\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1099-176X%28200003%293%3A1%3C55%3A%3AAID-MHP70%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1099-176X%28200003%293%3A1%3C55%3A%3AAID-MHP70%3E3.0.CO%3B2-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

Cartwright在本期中回顾的所有关于药物治疗成本效益的研究都表明,收益在一定程度上超过了成本。这次主要针对美国数据的审查对欧洲政策制定者有什么启示?药物治疗与卫生部门以外的广泛后果有关,各国的治疗制度存在相当大的差异。这很可能会影响结果。现有研究中使用的方法也存在相当大的差异,许多研究缺乏强有力的研究设计。一个有趣的特点是缺乏对吸毒者个人利益的评估,这是否意味着美国的政策制定者不关心吸毒者。欧洲或世界其他地区的情况会是一样的吗?还有很多研究要做,也许需要具体的指导方针来确保这一领域的经济评估能够更有信心地用于指导政策决策。版权所有©2000 John Wiley&;有限公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How can policy makers use available evidence on the cost benefits of drug treatement?

All the studies on the cost benefits of drug treatment reviewed by Cartwright in this issue suggest benefits outweigh costs by some margin. What lessons does this review of mainly American data have for European policy makers? Drug treatments are associated with a wide range of consequences outside the health sector and there are considerable differences in treatment regimes across countries. This could well influence results. There are also considerable differences in methodologies used across available studies and many lack strong study designs. An interesting feature is the lack of valuation of individual drug users benefits, does this imply that policy makers in the US do not care about drug misusers. Would the situation be the same in Europe or other parts of the world? There is a lot of research to be done and perhaps specific guidelines are required to ensure economic evaluations in this area can be used to guide policy decisions with more confidence. Copyright ©2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信