Jacob A Andrews , Mat Rawsthorne , Cosmin Manolescu , Matthew Burton McFaul , Blandine French , Elizabeth Rye , Rebecca McNaughton , Michael Baliousis , Sharron Smith , Sanchia Biswas , Erin Baker , Dean Repper , Yunfei Long , Tahseen Jilani , Jeremie Clos , Fred Higton , Nima Moghaddam , Sam Malins
{"title":"让心理治疗利益相关者参与负责任的研究，开发自动化反馈工具：从ExTRAPPOLATE项目中学习","authors":"Jacob A Andrews , Mat Rawsthorne , Cosmin Manolescu , Matthew Burton McFaul , Blandine French , Elizabeth Rye , Rebecca McNaughton , Michael Baliousis , Sharron Smith , Sanchia Biswas , Erin Baker , Dean Repper , Yunfei Long , Tahseen Jilani , Jeremie Clos , Fred Higton , Nima Moghaddam , Sam Malins","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding stakeholders’ views on novel autonomous systems in healthcare is essential to ensure these are not abandoned after substantial investment has been made. The ExTRAPPOLATE project applied the principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the development of an automated feedback system for psychological therapists, ‘AutoCICS’. A Patient and Practitioner Reference Group (PPRG) was convened over three online workshops to inform the system's development. Iterative workshops allowed proposed changes to the system (based on stakeholder comments) to be scrutinized. The PPRG reference group provided valuable insights, differentiated by role, including concerns and suggestions related to the applicability and acceptability of the system to different patients, as well as ethical considerations. The RRI approach enabled the <em>anticipation</em> of barriers to use, <em>reflection</em> on stakeholders’ views, effective <em>engagement</em> with stakeholders, and <em>action</em> to revise the design and proposed use of the system prior to testing in future planned feasibility and effectiveness studies. Many best practices and learnings can be taken from the application of RRI in the development of the AutoCICS system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962200021X/pdfft?md5=aaad5f2bbda984671acf004f7fb61ea1&pid=1-s2.0-S266665962200021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involving psychological therapy stakeholders in responsible research to develop an automated feedback tool: Learnings from the ExTRAPPOLATE project\",\"authors\":\"Jacob A Andrews , Mat Rawsthorne , Cosmin Manolescu , Matthew Burton McFaul , Blandine French , Elizabeth Rye , Rebecca McNaughton , Michael Baliousis , Sharron Smith , Sanchia Biswas , Erin Baker , Dean Repper , Yunfei Long , Tahseen Jilani , Jeremie Clos , Fred Higton , Nima Moghaddam , Sam Malins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding stakeholders’ views on novel autonomous systems in healthcare is essential to ensure these are not abandoned after substantial investment has been made. The ExTRAPPOLATE project applied the principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the development of an automated feedback system for psychological therapists, ‘AutoCICS’. A Patient and Practitioner Reference Group (PPRG) was convened over three online workshops to inform the system's development. Iterative workshops allowed proposed changes to the system (based on stakeholder comments) to be scrutinized. The PPRG reference group provided valuable insights, differentiated by role, including concerns and suggestions related to the applicability and acceptability of the system to different patients, as well as ethical considerations. The RRI approach enabled the <em>anticipation</em> of barriers to use, <em>reflection</em> on stakeholders’ views, effective <em>engagement</em> with stakeholders, and <em>action</em> to revise the design and proposed use of the system prior to testing in future planned feasibility and effectiveness studies. Many best practices and learnings can be taken from the application of RRI in the development of the AutoCICS system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of responsible technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962200021X/pdfft?md5=aaad5f2bbda984671acf004f7fb61ea1&pid=1-s2.0-S266665962200021X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of responsible technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962200021X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266665962200021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Involving psychological therapy stakeholders in responsible research to develop an automated feedback tool: Learnings from the ExTRAPPOLATE project
Understanding stakeholders’ views on novel autonomous systems in healthcare is essential to ensure these are not abandoned after substantial investment has been made. The ExTRAPPOLATE project applied the principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the development of an automated feedback system for psychological therapists, ‘AutoCICS’. A Patient and Practitioner Reference Group (PPRG) was convened over three online workshops to inform the system's development. Iterative workshops allowed proposed changes to the system (based on stakeholder comments) to be scrutinized. The PPRG reference group provided valuable insights, differentiated by role, including concerns and suggestions related to the applicability and acceptability of the system to different patients, as well as ethical considerations. The RRI approach enabled the anticipation of barriers to use, reflection on stakeholders’ views, effective engagement with stakeholders, and action to revise the design and proposed use of the system prior to testing in future planned feasibility and effectiveness studies. Many best practices and learnings can be taken from the application of RRI in the development of the AutoCICS system.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
